- 
  
      
Sign Up
 Categories
- Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser (258)
 - Case 02 Henry Keogh (15)
 - Case 03 David Szach (4)
 - Case 04 Gordon Wood (10)
 - Case 05 Derek Bromley (31)
 - Case 06 'Paul' (12)
 - Case 07 George Pell (10)
 - Case 08 Sarah May Ward (1)
 - Case 09 Joby Rowe (1)
 - Case 10 Steven Fennell (2)
 - Case 11 Robert Xie (45)
 - Case 12 Bradley Murdoch (2)
 - Case 13 Robert Farquharson (10)
 - Case 14 Scott Austic (2)
 - Case 15 John Fleming (1)
 - Case 16 Eddie Howard (1)
 - Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg (27)
 - Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann (43)
 - Case 19 Marco Rusterholz (7)
 - Case 20 The Cook family (1)
 - Case 21 'Mr & Mrs X' (1)
 - Case 22 Noel Greenaway (19)
 - Case 23 Lucy Letby (3)
 - Case 24 Fr Gordon MacRae (4)
 - Case 25 Cedric and Noelene Jordan (1)
 - Case 26 Frank Valentine (10)
 - CCRC (24)
 - Forensic evidence (13)
 - General articles (197)
 - Shaken Baby Syndrome (6)
 - Uncategorized (13)
 
- 
		
Recent Posts
 Recent Comments
- Kaneal Lindsey on Jesse Harvey and the curse of SBS
 - Jerry Fitzsimmons on Jesse Harvey and the curse of SBS
 - andrew on Jesse Harvey and the curse of SBS
 - g.churchill on Jesse Harvey and the curse of SBS
 - Rachael M on Lack of real accountability weakens the justice system
 
Archives
- November 2025
 - October 2025
 - September 2025
 - August 2025
 - July 2025
 - June 2025
 - May 2025
 - April 2025
 - March 2025
 - February 2025
 - January 2025
 - December 2024
 - November 2024
 - October 2024
 - August 2024
 - July 2024
 - June 2024
 - May 2024
 - April 2024
 - March 2024
 - February 2024
 - January 2024
 - December 2023
 - November 2023
 - September 2023
 - August 2023
 - July 2023
 - June 2023
 - May 2023
 - April 2023
 - March 2023
 - February 2023
 - January 2023
 - December 2022
 - November 2022
 - October 2022
 - September 2022
 - August 2022
 - July 2022
 - June 2022
 - May 2022
 - April 2022
 - March 2022
 - February 2022
 - January 2022
 - December 2021
 - November 2021
 - October 2021
 - September 2021
 - August 2021
 - July 2021
 - June 2021
 - May 2021
 - April 2021
 - March 2021
 - February 2021
 - January 2021
 - December 2020
 - November 2020
 - October 2020
 - September 2020
 - August 2020
 - July 2020
 - June 2020
 - May 2020
 - April 2020
 - March 2020
 - February 2020
 - January 2020
 - December 2019
 - November 2019
 - October 2019
 - September 2019
 - August 2019
 - July 2019
 - June 2019
 - May 2019
 - April 2019
 - March 2019
 - February 2019
 - January 2019
 - December 2018
 - November 2018
 - October 2018
 - September 2018
 - August 2018
 - July 2018
 - June 2018
 - April 2018
 - March 2018
 - February 2018
 - January 2018
 - November 2017
 - February 2016
 - November 2015
 - September 2015
 - May 2015
 - March 2015
 - February 2015
 - January 2015
 - December 2014
 - November 2014
 - September 2014
 - August 2014
 - July 2014
 - February 2014
 - January 2014
 - December 2013
 - November 2013
 - October 2013
 - August 2013
 
Meta
Monthly Archives: September 2020
Letter from the rip
This private letter is from a man who has led an exemplary life, but when accused of historical sexual molestation by a vengeful woman, then a youngster, years after the alleged events, he was tried and convicted, his life ruined. … Continue reading
									
						Posted in Case 06 'Paul'					
					
				
				
				10 Comments
							
		‘Shocking scandal nobody wants to touch’: MP
This is an edited version of the full article in the CLA news, by Bill Rowlings, CEO of Civil Liberties Australia.
									
						Posted in General articles					
					
				
				
				6 Comments
							
		Undercurrent – tv docoseries on Sue Neill-Fraser case online globally
Undercurrent, the 6-part docoseries digging into the investigation leading to the murder conviction of Tasmanian grandmother Sue Neill-Fraser broadcast on the Seven Network in March 2019, except in Tasmania, is now available to watch free, around the world, on TUBI. … Continue reading
									
						Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser					
					
				
				
				13 Comments
							
		Public register would endanger wrongfully convicted
Andrew L. Urban As controversial as this view may be, I urge great caution in lobbying for the currently proposed national public – public! – register of convicted child sex offenders – whom I abhor as much as everyone. There … Continue reading
									
						Posted in General articles					
					
				
				
				4 Comments
							
		Sloppy evidence gathering = wrongful conviction
Faulty bite mark analysis and the unreliable testimony of a prisoner delivered a rape & murder conviction against Robert DuBoise in Florida 37 years ago. He has just been released after the forensic testimony was discredited and DNA evidence confirmed … Continue reading
									
						Posted in Forensic evidence, General articles					
					
				
				
				Leave a comment
							
		Police gullibility or a rush to judgement?
Vanessa Engle’s 59 minute BBC2 doco, The Unbelievable Story of Carl Beech, is accurately titled; let’s hope we get to see it in Australia sometime soon (following its August 24, 2020 premiere in the UK). The readiness of police to … Continue reading
									
						Posted in General articles					
					
				
				
				Leave a comment
							
		What’s wrong Mr Attorney General? Do you know?
Andrew L. Urban. How can a man who doesn’t seem to know right from wrong be the Attorney General of an Australian State? I don’t know the answer, but I do believe I have evidence that NSW AG Mark Speakman … Continue reading
									
						Posted in General articles					
					
				
				
				7 Comments
							
		Incompetent, humiliated criminal system fails again
Andrew L. Urban. In just 60 Minutes last Sunday (6/9/20), Channel 9 has shown how the Cooks, a circus family from the Blue Mountains, were persecuted by a preposterous police prosecution of a case that not only lacked evidence of … Continue reading
									
						Posted in Case 20 The Cook family, General articles					
					
				
				
				5 Comments
							
		Sue Neill-Fraser case contradicts formal logic, analysis shows – part 3
In the 2010 trial of Sue Neill-Fraser, there was an absence of evidentiary proof for establishing the Major Premise of the crime – an essential fact for a valid inference of guilt, writes BENJAMIN DEAN,* in this 3-part analysis of … Continue reading
									
						Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser					
					
				
				
				3 Comments
							
		Sue Neill-Fraser case contradicts formal logic, analysis shows – part 2
In the 2010 trial of Sue Neill-Fraser, there was an absence of evidentiary proof for establishing the Major Premise of the crime – an essential fact for a valid inference of guilt, writes BENJAMIN DEAN,* in this 3-part analysis of … Continue reading
									
						Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser					
					
				
				
				5 Comments