Monthly Archives: September 2019

Pell appeal judges reversed onus of proof

Posted on September 18, 2019 by andrew

In seeking leave to appeal to the High Court, George Pell’s lawyers argue that the approach taken by the majority judges at his appeal ­required Pell to “establish actual innocence”, rather than “merely pointing to doubt”, which was a reversal … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 07 George Pell | 6 Comments

Steve Fennell not a murderer – jury got it wrong

Posted on September 16, 2019 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. The High Court in Canberra adjourned for just four minutes before resuming at 2.45pm on Wednesday, September 11, 2019, with a unanimous decision that Steven Fennell’s appeal against his murder conviction should be allowed. A verdict of … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 10 Steven Fennell | 4 Comments

Is there evidentiary basis for shaken baby syndrome? The conviction of Joby Rowe

Posted on September 10, 2019 by andrew

Chris Brook. Joby Rowe’s 2018 conviction for child homicide was based solely on forensic evidence that openly and overtly lacked any scientific basis, with expert opinions based instead on confession studies. This case raises fundamental questions for forensic science in … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 09 Joby Rowe, Shaken Baby Syndrome | 9 Comments

Sarah Ward – the dead of night

Posted on September 9, 2019 by andrew

It happened around 4am on June 7, 2008. Sarah Ward had been drinking and smoking dope. She took a friend’s car and went out for cigarettes with another friend. The young musicians they came across that dark night in Christie … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 08 Sarah May Ward | 12 Comments

Qld & Vic prosecutors set example for Tas prosecutor

Posted on September 4, 2019 by andrew

Dr Bob Moles & Andrew L. Urban.  It was made clear last night on the SBS program Insight – Wrongfully Convicted Part 2 (September 3, 2019), that the prosecutor in the Queensland case of Frank Button recognised that a significant … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 20 Comments