Getting the bastards back: Garry Nye v The Police

Posted on May 16, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban

 Garry Nye attended his own wake; I was invited. My book-length story on his life and troubles was well advanced. It turned out to be my first wrongful conviction report. Not long after, I wrote his obituary for The Australian. He had been determined: “For what they did to me and my family I wanted to get them back.” Just days after he hosted his own wake at a Rooty Hill pub (21/2/2004), Garry Nye passed away (1/3/2004) and was buried next to his mother’s grave at Rooty Hill on March 6, 2004 – her birthday.  Continue reading →

Posted in Case 29 Garry Nye | Leave a comment

From the Archives: Dr Colin Manock, the forensic fraudster (retired) whose incompetence tainted 10,000 autopsies

Posted on May 14, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban

It was in the main street of Mintabie, 980 kms northwest of Adelaide, the remote opal mining community (now closed). It was 1978 and an Aboriginal man had been found dead, in mysterious circumstances. The Coroner sent a team to investigate. Refusing an offer of a cool room for the procedure, the State’s forensic pathologist set up a make shift morgue in the street and proceeded to perform his gut wrenching task. After Dr Colin Manock had removed the bodily organs from the chest, he used a ladle to scoop up some of the body fluids and quipped, ‘does anybody fancy a slurp?’  Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 4 Comments

The Falconio Case: Questions That Refuse to Go Away

Posted on May 12, 2026 by andrew

The conviction of Bradley John Murdoch for the murder of Peter Falconio has always sat uncomfortably with anyone who looks closely at the evidence  or rather, the lack of it, writes STEVEN FENNELL.  Continue reading →

Posted in Case 12 Bradley Murdoch | 6 Comments

Does the presumption of innocence cease at appeal?

Posted on May 7, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban

After a guilty verdict, the defendant is entitled to appeal. In the cases we regard as wrongful convictions, an appeal is an essential step toward correcting error at trial. When is the assumption of innocence negated?  Continue reading →

Posted in Case 05 Derek Bromley | 8 Comments

From the archives: Derek Bromley’s appeal mangled by court

Posted on May 6, 2026 by andrew

The appeal court in Bromley has fundamentally failed to pay due regard to the rule of law and to the well-established principles governing criminal appeals, according to Flinders University legal academics Dr Bob Moles and Bibi Sangha, as we first reported on July 2, 2018.  Continue reading →

Posted in Case 05 Derek Bromley | 6 Comments

Welcome to context

Posted on May 5, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban

Contrary to his apparent intention, Dr Simon Longstaff’s heartfelt and personal reflection laid out in his column (The Australian, May 5, 2026) reinforces the inappropriateness of the practice known as “welcome to country” in 21st century Australia. The element missing is context. (This article is published here given the high level of the public interest and debate on the matter.)  Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Will Albo be called?

Posted on May 4, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban

It starts today. Witnesses will be heard at the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, starting with Alex Ryvchin,  co-chief executive of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry. Ever since the release of the Terms of Reference, we have been concerned at how probing Commissioner Virgina Bell will be to examine how Labor’s actions generated the environment in which antisemitism flourished since October 7, 2023. Are we heading for a case of wrongful conviction, wrongfully blaming failures of the security services while ignoring the grave mistakes – commissions and omissions – of PM Albanese and Team? See our full submission to the Commission. Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 3 Comments

The Lawyer X Scandal: Rule of Law or Necessary Evil?

Posted on May 3, 2026 by andrew

STEVEN FENNELL explores both sides of the Nicola Gobbo debate, wrongful convictions and the fracture of Australian justice.  Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 4 Comments

Marco Rusterholz: the ‘maybe’ case that courts found ‘sure’

Posted on May 1, 2026 by andrew

Convicted of a 2012 double murder, Marco Rusterholz believes he is (like Sue Neill-Fraser), a victim of Tasmania’s discredited legal system. To avoid an apprehension of bias, we have sought an independent, structured, adversarial analysis of his case by LIA (Legal Intel AI); a stress test. Continue reading →

Posted in Case 19 Marco Rusterholz | 1 Comment

The Cost of Appellate Complacency — a personal account

Posted on April 27, 2026 by andrew

In his post on April 25, 2026, The Record and the Reality:  What Transcripts Don’t Show in Criminal Appeal, STEVEN FENNELL argued that transcripts are an incomplete reconstruction of a trial. In this companion piece, he provides a cautionary tale from personal experience of what occurs when an appellate court doesn’t struggle with an incomplete record but actively adopts a mistaken narrative from the prosecution as part of its legal architecture. 
 Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 1 Comment