‘Unlawful’: Lehrmann slams secret corruption hearings

Bruce Lehrmann wants to air further allegations of mistreatment by the anti-corruption watchdog including that he was forced to give evidence during secret hearings and then gagged from discussing it, reports Miklos Bolza in CBR News.

Bolza reports that officials from the National Anti-Corruption Commission searched the 31-year-old’s home in June 2024 over allegations he misappropriated secret documents related to French submarines five years earlier.

The anti-corruption body was searching for sensitive documents on the since-abandoned submarine project Lehrmann was alleged to have stolen from the office of former defence minister Linda Reynolds.

He has denied the claims and has sought assistance from the federal government to cover his legal costs of the investigation.

Senator Reynolds’ former staffer is seeking to expand a Federal Court lawsuit against federal Special Minister of State Don Farrell and NACC Commissioner Paul Brereton.

His new allegations, revealed by the court on Tuesday, September 2, 2026, include that a two-day secret hearing forcing him to give evidence in October 2024 in Hobart was unlawful.

“The hearings were conducted unlawfully, without any compliance with rules of evidence, procedural fairness or natural justice,” he wrote. He criticised a non-disclosure notation gagging him from speaking about the hearings and said he had not been given transcripts despite being promised them.

Lehrmann has expanded his claims over the June 2024 raids – where two personal diaries were seized – saying they were conducted in excess of the corruption watchdog’s power.

The 31-year-old also alleges the commission breached its non-publication orders by revealing his name and travel details when booking plane tickets and hotel accommodation in September 2024 for separate hearings in Sydney.

He will fight to bring these additional claims against Farrell and Brereton at a hearing on October 15. At that time, he will seek court orders halting any inquiries, investigations or proceedings brought against him by the anti-corruption commission.

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | Leave a comment

Sue Neill-Fraser challenge to Parole Board free speech restriction rescheduled

Andrew L. Urban.

“Parole should be a pathway to reintegration, not a way of continuing to impose punishment. When parole conditions silence people or limit their freedom of expression, they violate basic human rights and increase the risk of re-incarceration,” says Sarah Schwartz Legal Director at the Human Rights Law Centre, which is spearheading the challenge. The Supreme Court hearing is now scheduled for Tuesday 15 September, 2026 at 2.15 pm. Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | Leave a comment

Justice Estcourt not in court, Sue Neill-Fraser v Parole Board hearing cancelled

The judge who dissented at her appeal and would have quashed her conviction, Justice Estcourt AM, fell ill and was unable to attend court this morning, resulting in the cancellation of the hearing where the Melbourne based Human Rights Law Centre was to challenge the Parole Board’s additional restriction on Sue Neill-Fraser’s parole conditions, preventing her claiming her innocence. Garry Stannus reports.  Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 1 Comment

Erin Patterson, the jury hotel and the curious case of the missing CCTV

REPORT

The judge in the Erin Patterson trial was so concerned about whether the jury had been protected from outside influence during its deliberations that he instructed authorities to try to preserve CCTV from the regional hotel where jurors were sequestered for six days.

What happened when the 12-person jury was sequestered in the same Gippsland hotel alongside police, prosecutors and media in July 2025 has become a central point in Patterson’s appeal against conviction for three murders and one attempted murder from the now infamous death cap mushroom lunch.

Posted in General articles | 1 Comment

Tasmanian Parole Board caves on Sue Neill-Fraser “improper” bail restriction

Just days before the August 31 Supreme Court hearing a challenge by the Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC) to an extra bail restriction imposed on Sue Neill-Fraser in April 2025 preventing her claiming her innocence, the Tasmanian Parole Board has removed that condition. Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 8 Comments

When “Youth” Becomes a Shield for Savagery, the System Has Failed

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: 
Dear Sir, I caught the news coverage of that horrific youth assault in Logan recently and was just utterly disgusted by it—especially the fact that they all walked out on bail, and the weak response to the girl who filmed the whole thing. It really stuck with me.  Continue reading

Posted in Case 10 Steven Fennell | 4 Comments

Judge’s antisemitism in plain sight

Andrew L. Urban.

What an exposé! Chris Merritt shows how a judge’s own words provide a rare and distressing insight into how this judge perceives the great public policy issue of our time: antisemitism and hatred of Israel. The judge’s ruling determined that Mohammed Farhat should not be subject to an extended supervision order when he completes his prison sentence for offences committed in a Jewish suburb of Sydney.  Continue reading

Posted in General articles | 1 Comment

Mean Girls and Bastard Boys in Parliament vs Fiona Brown in $1.48m settlement

Andrew L. Urban.

Decency deficiency is a parliamentary disease. Symptoms include abysmal behaviour by the Mean Girls and Bastard Boys towards Linda Reynolds and Fiona Brown and the refusal to apologise for it, while now grudgingly paying out $1.48 million to Brown after lengthy legal battles, in the continuing Brittany Higgins / Bruce Lehrmann saga.  Continue reading

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 7 Comments

Open Sore: anniversary of Sue Neill-Fraser arrest

Andrew L. Urban.

 Sixteen years ago on August 20 Sue Neill-Fraser was arrested at her home in Hobart for the murder of her partner, Bob Chappell, supposedly on their yacht Four Winds. A year later in 2010 Sue was tried, convicted and sentenced to 23 years in prison, of which she served 13 before being released on parole. But as we all know, she is not guilty. It’s an open sore on Tasmania’s legal system.  Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 1 Comment

Kidnapping adds mystery twist to much delayed murder conviction

Andrew L. Urban

It took 16 years to put Paul Charlton before a jury for the murder of his girlfriend, Joanne Howell. Just before the trial, he was kidnapped, taken into the bush, bashed and warned to plead guilty. The Herald Sun reported it, police took statements but the alleged thugs were never found. He pleaded not guilty. Emails to us from his partner Linda Barry (before a lapse in our communications) add some flesh to the bare bones of the time line. And there’s more to come on this story…  Continue reading

Posted in General articles | 5 Comments