Andrew L. Urban
“There is no dispute Roberts-Smith committed killings in Afghanistan. Indeed, it is for killing that he earned his Victoria Cross. But killing in wartime service is lawful and is not murder,” writes Noel Pearson. Continue reading
Andrew L. Urban
“There is no dispute Roberts-Smith committed killings in Afghanistan. Indeed, it is for killing that he earned his Victoria Cross. But killing in wartime service is lawful and is not murder,” writes Noel Pearson. Continue reading
Andrew L. Urban
On April 17, 2026, the legal system will face its first test – and its easiest – in the Ben Roberts-Smith case, dealing with his application for bail. The Ben Roberts-Smith trial could be years away. He is not a flight risk. He should be released on bail. Unwarranted denial of bail is a denial of justice. Continue reading
Andrew L. Urban
Bruce Lehrmann has been refused special leave to appeal to the High Court against his Federal Court civil conviction but did not rule on the merits of the rape finding. It simply decided the proposed appeal did not raise a sufficiently arguable legal question to justify granting special leave. Continue reading
Andrew L. Urban
Of my five books dealing with cases I regard as wrongful convictions, the most recent two examine cases of alleged historical sexual and physical abuse dating back over four decades. The only ‘evidence’ against the men was say-so based on memories of the complainants. They were found guilty. Now Ben Roberts-Smith is to face trial over alleged war crimes in Afghanistan about two decades ago also based on say so memories. Lawyers doubt his trial could be fair. Continue reading
Andrew L. Urban
That’s not my headline: it is the headline on an editorial in The Australian (April 9, 2026) and mirrors my own of the day before, referring to the five murder war crimes charges against Ben Roberts-Smith. The difference is that the Australian’s editorial expresses confidence in that legal system. I question that confidence. Continue reading
Andrew L. Urban
The trial of Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith for five war crime murders will be one of the most consequential criminal trials in Australian history. Under all the circumstances, including time elapsed, limited evidence and unpreserved crime scenes in a foreign, antagonistic country, can the prosecution mount compelling evidence that dispels reasonable doubt? Add the damning 2023 defamation trial that found him guilty of war crimes on the balance of probabilities, can this criminal trial really be fair? And did the validation process for his VC fail? Continue reading
A petition has been launched urging the Victorian Parliament “to establish an independent inquiry into paediatric forensic pathology practices and the legal frameworks governing expert evidence, particularly in cases involving Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) and Abusive Head Trauma (AHT).” Continue reading
Andrew L. Urban
April 5, 2026: Sorry, can’t resist the headline…. an eagle eyed reader of this blog living in Moscow alerted us to the 1990 wrongful conviction of David Tamihere for the 1989 murder of Urban Höglin and his girlfriend Heidi Birgitta Paakkonen. Tamihere has now had his convictions quashed by the Supreme Court, 36 years after he was found guilty of murdering the two Swedish backpackers in New Zealand’s Coromandel Peninsula. Continue reading
Andrew L. Urban
“If it’s not actually true, if Jesus didn’t rise from the dead in his body, I’d rather be at the races,” wrote one national columnist and devout Christian on Easter Saturday. That sentiment prompted this post. Continue reading
Andrew L. Urban
“It’s a new world. It’s the same Constitution.” Coming from the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court in the context of the consequential birthright citizenship debate, this is disturbingly lacking common sense. Arguably the best definition of common sense is basic intelligence which allows for plain understanding and without which good decisions or judgments cannot be made. Continue reading