-
Sign Up
Categories
- Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser (241)
- Case 02 Henry Keogh (11)
- Case 03 David Szach (3)
- Case 04 Gordon Wood (6)
- Case 05 Derek Bromley (18)
- Case 06 'Paul' (5)
- Case 07 George Pell (8)
- Case 08 Sarah May Ward (1)
- Case 09 Joby Rowe (1)
- Case 10 Steven Fennell (1)
- Case 11 Robert Xie (22)
- Case 12 Bradley Murdoch (2)
- Case 13 Robert Farquharson (6)
- Case 14 Scott Austic (2)
- Case 15 John Fleming (1)
- Case 16 Eddie Howard (1)
- Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg (20)
- Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann (12)
- Case 19 Marco Rusterholz (3)
- Case 20 The Cook family (1)
- Case 21 'Mr & Mrs X' (1)
- Case 22 Noel Greenaway (2)
- Case 23 Lucy Letby (1)
- Forensic evidence (12)
- General articles (159)
- Shaken Baby Syndrome (5)
- Uncategorized (8)
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- andrew on The justice of science for Folbigg
- Christie on The justice of science for Folbigg
- Don Wakeling on The justice of science for Folbigg
- andrew on The justice of science for Folbigg
- Christie W on The justice of science for Folbigg
Archives
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- February 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
Meta
Author Archives: andrew
Convictions that changed our world
One of the two most recent “convictions” that have changed our world by triggering violent responses was that Israel had targeted a Gaza hospital as part of its response to the Hamas atrocities of October 7, 2023. The other was … Continue reading
Posted in General articles
5 Comments
Tasmania: new Sheriff, same old cover up
Andrew L. Urban There is a new sheriff in Hobart town: Attorney-General Guy Barnett was appointed (in turbulent circumstances) to succeed Elise Archer in October 2023. But after years of stonewalling on calls for an inquiry into the murder conviction … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
16 Comments
The justice of science for Folbigg
Andrew L. Urban Kathleen Folbigg’s case is finally heading to the Appeals Court where it is expected her convictions for the murder of her children will be quashed, after findings in the latest inquiry, completed earlier this year, digested the … Continue reading
Posted in Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg
18 Comments
Should prosecutors take the oath?
Andrew L. Urban. The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth … that’s the oath taken by witnesses in criminal trials. But not by prosecutors. In our adversarial system, the truth can be an incidental benefit to a … Continue reading
Posted in General articles
22 Comments
Call to hold off on Criminal Cases Review Commission “baffling” – Dr Bob Moles
The call by The Bridge of Hope Innocence Initiative (BOHII) to hold off on the development of a Criminal Cases Review Commission “is quite frankly baffling,” comments Dr Bob Moles, “and can, in my opinion, only serve to alienate them from their main client group – … Continue reading
Posted in General articles
13 Comments
A decade of denial, Tasmania still a legal laughing stock
Andrew L. Urban. It was 10 years ago: “This case calls for an inquiry,” said the late and great defence barrister Chester Porter KC, after a public screening (at Sydney’s Chauvel Cinema) of Shadow of Doubt, Eve Ash’s documentary about … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
21 Comments
The wrongful conviction that harms children
Andrew L. Urban. Why am I writing about climate change on a blog devoted to wrongful convictions? My justification is that carbon dioxide has been wrongfully convicted of causing global warming, according to climate scientists, and the alarmism is causing … Continue reading
Posted in General articles
5 Comments
Imagining what Tasmanian justice might try to be
Today is the second anniversary of the tabling of papers in the Tasmanian Legislative Council that dissect many serious problems with the investigation and prosecution of Sue Neill-Fraser for the 2009 Australia Day murder of her partner, but Tasmanian media … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
4 Comments
Lucy Letby – serial baby killer or wrongfully convicted nurse?
A fascinating and gob-smacking interview of Dr Scott McLachlan by Norman Fenton that raises much doubt about Lucy Letby’s guilt is part of a report that takes the lid off the most sensational multiple death case in the UK. NIALL … Continue reading
Posted in Case 23 Lucy Letby
17 Comments
Open Letter to The Hon Elise Archer, Attorney-General of Tasmania
Dear Attorney, In my new book, The Exoneration Papers – Sue Neill-Fraser (Wilkinson Publishing), I challenge your claims as to why you have not and will not instigate a Commission of Inquiry into the case of Sue Neill-Fraser. I invite … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
6 Comments