Category Archives: Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann

Reynolds claim: the plot allegation behind Higgins’ rape allegation

Posted on July 9, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. “The Plan … started long before Lisa Wilkinson’s infamous Project interview in February 2021. Shortly after meeting Sharaz in May 2020 – some 14 months after the alleged rape – Higgins crafted a note about an ‘anatomy … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 14 Comments

How can men prove their innocence ?

Posted on July 5, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. Sexual assault, what people think of as rape and sexual intercourse without consent are not really the same thing, yet they are stapled together in the eyes of the law. The entire subject is one of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 06 'Paul', Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann, Case 22 Noel Greenaway | 3 Comments

Bruce Lehrmann “is not a rapist” – Rule of Law Institute

Posted on June 5, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban Bruce Lehrmann has not been convicted of rape – yet his name and reputation have suffered as if he had been. It was in the civil proceedings that Justice Lee ruled in favour of Network Ten and … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 12 Comments

‘This cannot stand’ – Bruce Lehrmann

Posted on May 31, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban.  Justice  Lee’s judgement is not reliant on any arguments by any of the parties, according to Bruce Lehrmann’s notice of appeal against Justice Lee’s judgement in his failed defamation trial: ‘this cannot stand’ is his stance, broke … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 7 Comments

The Sofronoff Express at Platform ‘Speed’

Posted on May 24, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. The Magna Carta meets the ACT’s legal system on the Sofronoff express in what promises to be a historic and relevant journey into pretty wild legal territory. That territory is strewn with the carcasses of legal reputations, … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, Case 05 Derek Bromley, Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 4 Comments

Should Lehrmann appeal? The new dispute

Posted on May 4, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. What’s worse than the stigma of being labelled a rapist? Being unable to wipe the label clean. Why would anyone not try, if they claimed innocence? For Lehrmann, the label is a life sentence, even though it … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 15 Comments

The Lehrmann verdict – your say 2

Posted on May 3, 2024 by andrew

The following are some of the comments / excerpts in response to Andrew L. Urban’s article in The Spectator Australia on May 1, 2024, ‘Was Lehrmann’s presumption of innocence left in the lions’ den?’ Reader comments were taken down and … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 7 Comments

The Lehrmann verdict – your say

Posted on April 27, 2024 by andrew

Judging by published comments, the public largely rejects Justice Lee’s judgement that on the balance of probabilities Bruce Lehrmann raped Brittany Higgins on Senator Reynolds’ Ministerial couch. We publish a selection to demonstrate. 

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 13 Comments

Was Lehrmann’s presumption of innocence left in ‘lions’ den’?

Posted on April 26, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. It was over dinner that a former senior Australian Federal Police investigator brought it up. A question no-one appears to have considered.

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 4 Comments

NACC ‘no comment’ response re inquiry into Higgins payout probe

Posted on April 19, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. It is open to infer that the National Anti Corruption Commission (NACC) is preparing to investigate the controversial and secretive Brittany Higgins payout of $2.44m, partly based on its bland response to our request yesterday for information. … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 16 Comments