Category Archives: Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann

The Sofronoff Express at Platform ‘Speed’

Andrew L. Urban. The Magna Carta meets the ACT’s legal system on the Sofronoff express in what promises to be a historic and relevant journey into pretty wild legal territory. That territory is strewn with the carcasses of legal reputations, … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, Case 05 Derek Bromley, Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 4 Comments

Should Lehrmann appeal? The new dispute

Andrew L. Urban. What’s worse than the stigma of being labelled a rapist? Being unable to wipe the label clean. Why would anyone not try, if they claimed innocence? For Lehrmann, the label is a life sentence, even though it … Continue reading

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 12 Comments

The Lehrmann verdict – your say 2

The following are some of the comments / excerpts in response to Andrew L. Urban’s article in The Spectator Australia on May 1, 2024, ‘Was Lehrmann’s presumption of innocence left in the lions’ den?’ Reader comments were taken down and … Continue reading

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 7 Comments

The Lehrmann verdict – your say

Judging by published comments, the public largely rejects Justice Lee’s judgement that on the balance of probabilities Bruce Lehrmann raped Brittany Higgins on Senator Reynolds’ Ministerial couch. We publish a selection to demonstrate. 

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 11 Comments

Was Lehrmann’s presumption of innocence left in ‘lions’ den’?

Andrew L. Urban. It was over dinner that a former senior Australian Federal Police investigator brought it up. A question no-one appears to have considered.

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 4 Comments

NACC ‘no comment’ response re inquiry into Higgins payout probe

Andrew L. Urban. It is open to infer that the National Anti Corruption Commission (NACC) is preparing to investigate the controversial and secretive Brittany Higgins payout of $2.44m, partly based on its bland response to our request yesterday for information. … Continue reading

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 16 Comments

Dear NACC, tell us about the $2.44m Higgins payout probe

In this open letter to the NACC, ANDREW L. URBAN, explains why the NACC must publish the terms of its investigation into the hurried and secretive payout of $2.44 million to Brittany Higgins, based on what are now revealed to … Continue reading

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 7 Comments

The Lehrmann/Higgins “omnishambles” and the omniquestions

Andrew L. Urban. Justice Lee called the Lehrmann/Higgins drama an omnishambles, finding that Lehrmann effectively raped Higgins by not getting consent while she lay in a drunken stupor. It is “an outcome that must be respected but one that is … Continue reading

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 7 Comments

Lehrmann ‘probably’ recklessly disregarded absence of consent

Andrew L. Urban. Justice Lee filled 332 pages detailing his judgement in the defamation case of Lehrmann v Network Ten and Wilkinson, with all but three of the multitude of individuals involved subject to criticism in the matter. But only … Continue reading

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 20 Comments

Presumption of Innocence conference under attack

Andrew L. Urban. A petition to cancel the upcoming Restoring the Presumption of Innocence Conference inadvertently makes the very point of the conference: the need to protect the presumption of innocence. The Conference, organised by Bettina Arndt and hosted by … Continue reading

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 6 Comments