Category Archives: Case 22 Noel Greenaway

How can men prove their innocence ?

Posted on July 5, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. Sexual assault, what people think of as rape and sexual intercourse without consent are not really the same thing, yet they are stapled together in the eyes of the law. The entire subject is one of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 06 'Paul', Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann, Case 22 Noel Greenaway | 3 Comments

Should we lower the bar to get ‘justice’?

Posted on June 25, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. Well now, the Law Reform Commission, which has never looked at reforms that might minimise wrongful convictions, is conducting a probe into the nation’s sexual assault laws to examine whether civil ­remedies, with lower standards of proof, … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 22 Noel Greenaway, General articles | 7 Comments

Skeletons in the legal closet – look inside

Posted on May 27, 2024 by andrew

They are prisoners. But they are wrongfully convicted, as we have shown here and elsewhere, supported by legal argument. They are skeletons in the legal closet; catastrophic failures- – but the legal system seems unable and/or unwilling to admit error … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, Case 05 Derek Bromley, Case 11 Robert Xie, Case 13 Robert Farquharson, Case 19 Marco Rusterholz, Case 22 Noel Greenaway | 4 Comments

The law as manhunt

Posted on April 5, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. I visited Noel Greenaway in maximum security last year. As he came out to greet me, I made a mental note that he was wearing spotless white overalls; prison issue. How ironic, I thought, yet how fitting. … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 06 'Paul', Case 22 Noel Greenaway | 14 Comments

Rape or sour grapes?

Posted on March 9, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban  The day before the rape trial began last month, the complainant’s deception came to light: she had rehearsed a script for a phone call to manipulate the accused into making admissions to a rape that didn’t happen. … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 06 'Paul', Case 22 Noel Greenaway | 2 Comments

Noel Greenaway – the evidence in his defence

Posted on March 1, 2024 by andrew

The following excerpt from PRESUMPTION OF EVIL, Andrew L. Urban’s latest book, challenges Greenaway’s convictions for the sexual and physical abuse of teenage girls at Parramatta Girls Training School nearly half a century before the trial. 

Posted in Case 22 Noel Greenaway | 5 Comments

Presumption of evil

Posted on February 23, 2024 by andrew

In his new book, Presumption of evil, Andrew L. Urban examines one of the most egregious miscarriages of justice: the case of Noel Greenaway, convicted on the say-so of a handful of women. 

Posted in Case 22 Noel Greenaway | 2 Comments

Say-so evidence of sexual assault against Greenaway underpins crimen exceptum

Posted on January 14, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban.  Noel Greenaway, a model citizen of impeccable character in his late 70s, is convicted of 18 nasty sexual and physical abuse offences alleged to have occurred in the 1960s – half a century in the past – … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 22 Noel Greenaway | 3 Comments

Moral crusade claims another victim

Posted on January 6, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. Coinciding with the trial of Lisa Wilkinson and Network TEN for defamation, brought by Bruce Lehrmann who Brittany Higgins had accused of rape, I was putting the finishing touches to my manuscript, Presumption of Evil, in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 22 Noel Greenaway | 14 Comments

CCRC would relieve politicians of impossible choice

Posted on August 13, 2023 by andrew

As things stand, politicians burdened with the responsibilities of Attorney-General often face the impossible choice of advising the relevant Governor on petitions from innocents convicted of sexual abuse. It should not be their choice; legal matters should stay within the … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 06 'Paul', Case 22 Noel Greenaway, CCRC, General articles | 26 Comments