-
Sign Up
Categories
- Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser (229)
- Case 02 Henry Keogh (11)
- Case 03 David Szach (3)
- Case 04 Gordon Wood (6)
- Case 05 Derek Bromley (17)
- Case 06 'Paul' (3)
- Case 07 George Pell (8)
- Case 08 Sarah May Ward (1)
- Case 09 Joby Rowe (1)
- Case 10 Steven Fennell (1)
- Case 11 Robert Xie (22)
- Case 12 Bradley Murdoch (2)
- Case 13 Robert Farquharson (6)
- Case 14 Scott Austic (2)
- Case 15 John Fleming (1)
- Case 16 Eddie Howard (1)
- Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg (15)
- Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann (3)
- Case 19 Marco Rusterholz (3)
- Forensic evidence (12)
- General articles (148)
- Shaken Baby Syndrome (5)
- Uncategorized (7)
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Garry Stannus on Marco Rusterholz and the question of doubt
- andrew on Marco Rusterholz and the question of doubt
- Garry Stannus on Marco Rusterholz and the question of doubt
- julie stanford on Bradley Murdoch – how DNA may have misled the jury
- Father Ted Whalensky on Marco Rusterholz and the question of doubt
Archives
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- February 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
Meta
Category Archives: Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg
Folbigg diaries a “dump” of her emotions
Convicted child killer Kathleen Folbigg told a close friend she used her incriminating diaries to “dump” her negative emotions in her grief and blamed herself, feeling that she had “failed as a mother, a woman”, letters tendered in an inquiry … Continue reading
Posted in Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg
49 Comments
Duty of disclosure lasts forever
The duty of disclosure of “all matters within their knowledge” applies to all those who represent the Crown – and is a duty in perpetuity, write BIBI SANGHA and Dr BOB MOLES of Flinders University, in their December 21, 2022, … Continue reading
NSW A-G’s prejudicial remarks in Folbigg case
Andrew L. Urban. As the second inquiry into the murder convictions of Kathleen Folbigg winds up its first week, we ask why NSW Attorney-General Mark Speakman made his prejudicial remarks.
Posted in Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg
5 Comments
Folbigg review starts – and extends into 2023
Andrew L. Urban. The much delayed second inquiry into the Kathleen Folbigg murder conviction begins this Monday, November 14, 2022. But in a disgraceful disregard for delivering justice in a timely manner, the inquiry won’t hear crucial evidence regarding the … Continue reading
Posted in Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg
11 Comments
Kathleen Folbigg conviction next under microscope – others on the way
Andrew L. Urban The high profile case of Kathleen Folbigg’s 2003 conviction for the murder of her very young children will be under the microscope again in a second inquiry starting November 14, 2022 (listed for two weeks), with former … Continue reading
The lawless country?
Andrew L. Urban. You might sleep soundly in the belief that Australia has a robust, fair and competent criminal justice system. Dream on. The System itself sometimes contributes to lawlessness in the administration of justice.
The Big Folbigg Mistake – reviewed
Andrew L. Urban. There is no worse crime than a mother murdering her own toddlers… four of them. Is there? Well, maybe one: wrongfully convicting a mother of such a deed. In his new book, The Big Folbigg Mistake, author … Continue reading
Posted in Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg
10 Comments
Second inquiry into 2003 Folbigg conviction – what’s the hurry?
Andrew L. Urban. We report (sourced with thanks from The Australian, May 18, 2022) and comment (in red) on the latest development in this case.
Posted in Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg
18 Comments
NSW A-G in ‘state sanctioned abuse’ over Folbigg
A ground-breaking development within clinical practice has prompted Kathleen Folbigg’s lawyer Rhanee Rego to accuse NSW Attorney-General Mark Speakman of failing to act on the evidence “which unequivocally supports innocence” without anything to contradict it. She told Lawyers Weekly that … Continue reading
Posted in Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg
1 Comment
Kathleen Folbigg – The Science v The Courts
Follow ‘the science’? So far, as we reported in March 2021, the courts have resisted that call in the case of Kathleen Folbigg, convicted of murdering her children and in prison for the past 19 years. With more new expert … Continue reading
Posted in Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg
19 Comments