-
Sign Up
Categories
- Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser (229)
- Case 02 Henry Keogh (11)
- Case 03 David Szach (3)
- Case 04 Gordon Wood (6)
- Case 05 Derek Bromley (17)
- Case 06 'Paul' (3)
- Case 07 George Pell (8)
- Case 08 Sarah May Ward (1)
- Case 09 Joby Rowe (1)
- Case 10 Steven Fennell (1)
- Case 11 Robert Xie (22)
- Case 12 Bradley Murdoch (2)
- Case 13 Robert Farquharson (6)
- Case 14 Scott Austic (2)
- Case 15 John Fleming (1)
- Case 16 Eddie Howard (1)
- Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg (15)
- Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann (3)
- Case 19 Marco Rusterholz (3)
- Forensic evidence (12)
- General articles (148)
- Shaken Baby Syndrome (5)
- Uncategorized (7)
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Garry Stannus on Marco Rusterholz and the question of doubt
- andrew on Marco Rusterholz and the question of doubt
- Garry Stannus on Marco Rusterholz and the question of doubt
- julie stanford on Bradley Murdoch – how DNA may have misled the jury
- Father Ted Whalensky on Marco Rusterholz and the question of doubt
Archives
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- February 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
Meta
Category Archives: Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
Malpractice, Incompetence And Lies: the Manock curse – Part 2
Journalist Andrew L. Urban and retired barrister Kevin Borrick KC reveal how South Australia’s legal fraternity contributed to the ongoing scandal that began with the unqualified forensic pathologist Dr Colin Manock and spread like cancer, infecting the entire system. The … Continue reading
Malpractice, Incompetence And Lies: the Manock curse – Part 1
Journalist Andrew L. Urban and retired barrister Kevin Borrick KC reveal how South Australia’s legal fraternity contributed to the ongoing scandal that began with the unqualified forensic pathologist Dr Colin Manock and spread like cancer, infecting the entire system. The … Continue reading
Duty of disclosure lasts forever
The duty of disclosure of “all matters within their knowledge” applies to all those who represent the Crown – and is a duty in perpetuity, write BIBI SANGHA and Dr BOB MOLES of Flinders University, in their December 21, 2022, … Continue reading
Sue Neill-Fraser case for CCRC
Andrew L. Urban. Following two unsuccessful appeals against her conviction for the 2009 murder of her partner Bob Chappell and twice refused leave to appeal to the High Court, Sue Neill-Fraser’s controversial 12 year old conviction is an ideal matter … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, General articles
16 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser not a stereotypical killer – Parole Board
Tasmania’s Parole Board has published its reasons for releasing Sue Neill-Fraser on parole after 13 years (of a 23 year sentence), and noted that she did not present like a stereotypical killer. The Parole Board said Mr Chappell’s death was … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
26 Comments
Strictly legal – seminar provides lesson in law for judge
The President of the Law Society and the Attorney-General of Tasmania must provide legal references if they disagree with the points raised by Dr BOB MOLES* in his address at the seminar, Lifting the Lid on Miscarriages of Justice – … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
23 Comments
Everyone pays the price for silence … Tasmania warned
The Hobart Mercury’s crime reporter David Killick’s Nov. 26, 2022, scathing analysis of Tasmanian Attorney-General’s latest decision makes sobering reading.
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, General articles
15 Comments
Tasmania’s O’Farrell Review – questions raised by MP
Andrew L. Urban A series of probing questions have been placed on the Legislative Council Notice Paper about the already disgraced O’Farrell Review into illegal surveillance in Risdon prison, a fallout of the Sue Neill-Fraser case.
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
10 Comments
Why the courts have not silenced the uproar over Sue Neill-Fraser case
Andrew L. Urban. Tasmania’s legal establishment wants to shut it down but the continuing uproar of dissent over the demonstrable wrongful conviction of Sue Neill-Fraser will not be silenced. As we show here, there is a great deal to uproar … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
18 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser injustice product of ‘our Tasmanian legal fraternity’
Andrew L. Urban. Former Hobart prosecutor Tony Jacobs has reviewed the case of Sue Neill-Fraser and found many reasons for the conviction to be overturned, urging the Law Society to “help correct this injustice, the product of our Tasmanian legal … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
29 Comments