Category Archives: Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser

The death of Bob Chappell & the damnation of TasPol: call for the Tasmanian A-G to ask to re-open the appeal of Sue Neill-Fraser

Andrew L. Urban. Evidence withheld by police, misleading forensic evidence and serious investigation failures into the death of Bob Chappell (including the unchecked mobile phone records of key witness Meaghan Vass) revealed in a damning submission calling for the Attorney … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 26 Comments

TasPol failed to disclose key evidence and ran a flawed investigation into the death of Bob Chappell: report

Andrew L. Urban. A lengthy report that details flawed police investigation practices and failure to disclose evidence, has been sent to Tasmania’s Attorney General, Elise Archer, bringing to light information that has not been presented to court at either the … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 27 Comments

What if … continued: how another appeal by Sue Neill-Fraser could get to court

Prompted by a reader’s question to our previous What if … story, Flinders University legal academic Dr BOB MOLES lays out how any new appeal could navigate the rules to arrive in court. 

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 2 Comments

What if … a worst case scenario for Sue Neill-Fraser

While waiting for the judges’ decision on her March 2021 appeal, ‘What if the appeal is dismissed,’ ask readers whose confidence in Tasmania’s criminal justice system has been utterly destroyed by the prosecution of Sue Neill-Fraser, convicted in 2010 of … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 9 Comments

Long sentences that don’t make sense

Some sentences are incomprehensible.

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 9 Comments

What we’ve learned about the administration of the law in Tasmania

Andrew L. Urban. After eight years of studying the case of mild mannered Hobart grandmother Sue Neill-Fraser, convicted of murdering her partner Bob Chappell on Australia Day, 2009, we have learnt that administering the law in Tasmania doesn’t always work … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 33 Comments

Legal Profession Board complaint against …. who was that?

We invited the Legal Profession Board of Tasmania to respond to our criticism (published June 11, 2021) of its dismissal of the complaint against Stuart Wright, Meaghan Vass’ lawyer at the Sue Neill-Fraser appeal (March 1-3, 2021) and await their … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 7 Comments

ENQUIRY into Sue Neill-Fraser’s unlawful murder conviction

PREAMBLE Tasmania’s legal system and political leadership have ignored several calls over the years for an enquiry or a Royal Commission into the 2010 murder conviction of Sue Neill-Fraser. Well, if they won’t, we will. After eight years of investigating … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | Leave a comment

Tasmania – where The Law wears protection

The latest example of Tasmania’s legal system protecting itself from scrutiny is the Legal Profession Board of Tasmania dismissing a complaint against a practicing lawyer by mischaracterising the complaint. It follows the pattern of self-serving self protection exhibited throughout the … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 17 Comments

Legal Profession Board wrongly dismisses Vass complaint against Wright

Andrew L. Urban. The tumultuous end (in March 2021) to the latest appeal* against her murder conviction by Sue Neill-Fraser, was detonated by an unfulfilled undertaking from Stuart Wright, the lawyer assigned to key witness Meaghan Vass. Vass complained to … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 36 Comments