-
Sign Up
Categories
- Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser (245)
- Case 02 Henry Keogh (11)
- Case 03 David Szach (3)
- Case 04 Gordon Wood (7)
- Case 05 Derek Bromley (26)
- Case 06 'Paul' (9)
- Case 07 George Pell (10)
- Case 08 Sarah May Ward (1)
- Case 09 Joby Rowe (1)
- Case 10 Steven Fennell (1)
- Case 11 Robert Xie (25)
- Case 12 Bradley Murdoch (2)
- Case 13 Robert Farquharson (8)
- Case 14 Scott Austic (2)
- Case 15 John Fleming (1)
- Case 16 Eddie Howard (1)
- Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg (23)
- Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann (34)
- Case 19 Marco Rusterholz (5)
- Case 20 The Cook family (1)
- Case 21 'Mr & Mrs X' (1)
- Case 22 Noel Greenaway (12)
- Case 23 Lucy Letby (2)
- Case 24 Fr Gordon MacRae (3)
- CCRC (21)
- Forensic evidence (13)
- General articles (186)
- Shaken Baby Syndrome (5)
- Uncategorized (9)
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Geri Rizzo on Behind the scenes at #MeToo sexual assault lawfare
- Heinrich on Behind the scenes at #MeToo sexual assault lawfare
- Leonid Lerner on Bradley Murdoch – how DNA may have misled the jury
- andrew on The Staircase – step by step injustice
- Sharon Montour on The Staircase – step by step injustice
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- February 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
Meta
Category Archives: Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
A law unto their learned selves
Examples of senior legal practitioners disregarding the law and not being held accountable for it is evident in Australia’s criminal legal system writes Andrew L. Urban. The judges of the South Australian court of criminal appeal have accepted that Henry … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
Leave a comment
“We want Tim Ellis fired” – Tasmania’s anger at DPP
By Andrew L. Urban It took just one hour for the first 600 people to register a ‘Like’ on the newly launched facebook page titled ‘We want Tim Ellis fired’ on December 23, 2014, immediately after Ellis was given a … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
5 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser – poor start to police investigation
By Andrew L. Urban It is only with full confidence in our police and the courts that a democracy remains healthy and strong; that’s obvious. In a democracy, neither of these institutions should behave like their counterparts in a police … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
Leave a comment
Sue Neill-Fraser – fundamental failure of the rule of law
By Andrew L. Urban Several serious legal errors were made at the 2010 trial of Sue Neill-Fraser, any one of which warrants the murder conviction being set aside, according to a legal expert in miscarriages of justice, Dr Bob Moles. … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
1 Comment
Sue Neill-Fraser – new DNA report contradicts conviction
By Andrew L. Urban In what acclaimed legal expert Dr Bob Moles describes (60 Minutes, 9 Network, Sunday, August 24, 2014) as the worst miscarriage of justice in 40 years, the 2010 murder conviction of Sue Neill-Fraser has now been … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
4 Comments
Sue Neill Fraser – ‘Police Chief’ on failures of investigation
By Andrew L. Urban Tunnel vision by police investigators is one of the leading causes of wrongful convictions, according to a respected former Detective Inspector, when alternative theories to the crime are not considered and potential suspects are eliminated from … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
Leave a comment
Sue Neill Fraser – why should we listen to Dr Bob Moles?
By Andrew L. Urban Tasmanian MPs have been invited to attend a special Parliamentary briefing (August 19, 2014) by Adelaide based law expert Dr Bob Moles, canvassing the errors and flaws Dr Moles has identified in relation to the (arguably … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
Leave a comment
Sue Neill Fraser – 5th anniversary, nothing to celebrate
By Andrew L. Urban August 20, 2014, marks 5 years to the day since the arrest of Hobart grandmother Sue Neill Fraser, for the murder of her partner Bob Chappell. She has been in custody ever since, without pre-trial bail … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
Leave a comment
Sue Neill-Fraser – Manufacturing A Murder
By Andrew L. Urban Sue Neill-Fraser will celebrate – if that’s the word – her 60th birthday on March 3, 2014 inside Hobart’s Risdon prison, shut away from her daughters and grandchildren, serving a 23 year sentence for the murder … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
2 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser: Hobart protest rally
By Andrew L. Urban Saturday, January 25, 2014: Independent MP Andrew Wilkie (Denison, Tas) became the first Tasmanian MP to speak out publicly about the controversial murder conviction of Sue Neill-Fraser, jailed in 2010 for 23 years. He spoke last … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
Leave a comment