-
Sign Up
Categories
- Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser (251)
- Case 02 Henry Keogh (14)
- Case 03 David Szach (4)
- Case 04 Gordon Wood (10)
- Case 05 Derek Bromley (29)
- Case 06 'Paul' (10)
- Case 07 George Pell (10)
- Case 08 Sarah May Ward (1)
- Case 09 Joby Rowe (1)
- Case 10 Steven Fennell (2)
- Case 11 Robert Xie (40)
- Case 12 Bradley Murdoch (2)
- Case 13 Robert Farquharson (10)
- Case 14 Scott Austic (2)
- Case 15 John Fleming (1)
- Case 16 Eddie Howard (1)
- Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg (25)
- Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann (36)
- Case 19 Marco Rusterholz (5)
- Case 20 The Cook family (1)
- Case 21 'Mr & Mrs X' (1)
- Case 22 Noel Greenaway (16)
- Case 23 Lucy Letby (2)
- Case 24 Fr Gordon MacRae (4)
- Case 25 Cedric and Noelene Jordan (1)
- CCRC (22)
- Forensic evidence (13)
- General articles (194)
- Shaken Baby Syndrome (5)
- Uncategorized (11)
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Michael Waters on Lucky girl, that Brittany
- Anne on Bradley Murdoch – how DNA may have misled the jury
- Anne Webster on Bradley Murdoch – how DNA may have misled the jury
- Steven Dyson on Derek Bromley granted parole after 40 years
- Nina on Bradley Murdoch – how DNA may have misled the jury
Archives
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- February 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
Meta
Category Archives: Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
Sue Neill-Fraser was not at crime scene
Andrew L. Urban When At 11.50 am on Monday March 1, 2021, at the Sue Neill-Fraser appeal in Hobart, Meaghan Vass replied ‘Yes’ to the first question put to her by Robert Richter QC, the pent up anticipation of a … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
25 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser appeal check list
Andrew L. Urban. For the benefit of members of the public following the Sue Neill-Fraser appeal (against her 2010 conviction for the murder of her partner Bob Chappell) in Hobart’s Supreme Court commencing Monday, March 1, 2021, we have compiled … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
20 Comments
Robert Richter QC to lead Sue Neill-Fraser appeal team
One of the prominent barristers who has always maintained that Sue Neill-Fraser’s murder conviction is unsustainable, Melbourne based Robert Richter QC, has announced in the Tasmanian Court of Criminal Appeal today via videolink from Melbourne that he will lead her … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
14 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser appeal – logistics update
Sue Neill-Fraser’s Melbourne-based instructing solicitor, Paul Galbally’s travel hopes to attend her new appeal against her 2010 murder conviction in Hobart’s Supreme Court from March 1 improved markedly today as Tasmania lifted the high risk level restrictions on travellers from … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
10 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser supreme court appeal – evidence Fact Sheet letterbox drop
Some 20,000 Fact Sheets (see below) about the Sue Neill-Fraser case will be distributed to letter boxes around Hobart ahead of her latest appeal that begins on March 1, 2021, in Hobart Supreme Court, as a community service on behalf … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
20 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser appeal to start soon – but will it end the nightmare?
Andrew L. Urban. Sue Neill-Fraser, 65, has never hugged her grandchildren outside prison. She was arrested# on August 20, 2009, charged with murdering her partner Bob Chappell on Australia Day 2009. We hereby mark the bleak 12th anniversary. She has … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
29 Comments
The knife, the wrench, the prosecutor and his prejudice
Andrew L. Urban An observer at the 2010 murder trial of Sue Neill-Fraser has confirmed that early in the trial, the prosecutor, then DPP Tim Ellis SC, held up a large knife – flourishing it inside a plastic bag as … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
26 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser appeal deferred (yet again) to March 1, 2021
Andrew L. Urban. Just 18 months before Sue Neill-Fraser becomes eligible for parole after 13 years in prison, her new appeal will now be heard in the first week of March 2021 – coronavirus travel restrictions permitting, it was decided … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
45 Comments
Undercurrent – tv docoseries on Sue Neill-Fraser case online globally
Undercurrent, the 6-part docoseries digging into the investigation leading to the murder conviction of Tasmanian grandmother Sue Neill-Fraser broadcast on the Seven Network in March 2019, except in Tasmania, is now available to watch free, around the world, on TUBI. … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
13 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser case contradicts formal logic, analysis shows – part 3
In the 2010 trial of Sue Neill-Fraser, there was an absence of evidentiary proof for establishing the Major Premise of the crime – an essential fact for a valid inference of guilt, writes BENJAMIN DEAN,* in this 3-part analysis of … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
3 Comments