Author Archives: andrew

Sue Neill-Fraser – the crux of the appeal & best case scenario

Posted on May 27, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban After hearing the appeal against Sue Neill-Fraser’s controversial 2010 conviction of the 2009 murder of her partner Bob Chappell, the three judges walked out of No 1 court in Hobart’s Supreme Court on March 3, 2021, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 48 Comments

Junk science to keep littering courts

Posted on May 22, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban National cabinet (that bastard child of the pandemic) has dumped the review by the nation’s Attorneys-General into junk science that was to lead to reforms in crucial evidence presented in courts.

Posted in General articles | 6 Comments

Robert Xie hounded, wounded, wrongfully convicted

Posted on May 12, 2021 by andrew

Following our exhaustive, 3-part examination of the case starting on April 23, 2021, now, 10 years after his arrest, we expose the cumulative injustice that was perpetrated on Robert Xie in the wake of a vicious attack that killed almost … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 11 Robert Xie | 8 Comments

Laughter in court

Posted on May 2, 2021 by andrew

We believe in the importance of comedy, and agree with writer, actor, philosopher Stephen Fry who once said, “It is easy to forget that the most important aspect of comedy, after all, its great saving grace, is its ambiguity. You … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 11 Comments

Tunnel vision by another name

Posted on April 27, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban Tunnel vision compromised the police investigations into the deaths of Bob Chappell in Tasmania and five members of the Lin family in NSW (two of many examples), with Sue Neill-Fraser convicted of the former and Robert Xie … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 7 Comments

Robert Xie conviction requires urgent High Court correction – Part 3: evidence matters

Posted on April 26, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban, Phillip Chapman  The conviction of Robert Xie for the blood-soaked, savage murder of five members of his wife’s family in 2009 – going against his alibi – took four trials, including the longest trial in NSW legal … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 11 Robert Xie | 2 Comments

Robert Xie conviction requires urgent High Court correction – Part 2: Appeal Court judges erred

Posted on April 24, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban, Phillip Chapman  The conviction of Robert Xie for the blood-soaked, savage murder of five members of his wife’s family in 2009 – against his alibi and absent a credible motive – took four trials, including the longest … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 11 Robert Xie | 6 Comments

Robert Xie conviction requires urgent High Court correction – Part 1: Her Honour erred

Posted on April 23, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban, Phillip Chapman The conviction of Robert Xie for the blood-soaked, savage murder of five members of his wife’s family in 2009 took four trials, including the longest trial in NSW legal history for a single defendant, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 11 Robert Xie | 1 Comment

Prosecutor’s allegation haunts forthcoming Jeff Thompson trial

Posted on April 22, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban The allegation by Jack Shapiro, a lawyer at the Office of the Tasmanian DPP, that Hobart solicitor Jeff Thompson “duped” a prisoner in the course of working on the Sue Neill-Fraser appeal, is haunting Thompson’s forthcoming trial … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 34 Comments

Shadow of Doubt – the movie that shone a light

Posted on April 5, 2021 by andrew

As the judges of the Tasmanian Court of Criminal Appeal consider their decision in the case of Sue Neill-Fraser, we publish ANDREW L. URBAN’s review of the Eve Ash documentary, Shadow of Doubt, published on the film’s July 2013 release. … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 12 Comments