Monthly Archives: August 2021

Found, abandoned, contaminated, misrepresented – sad story of the red jacket

Posted on August 15, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. The last of the Etter/Selby investigative papers into the case of Sue Neill-Fraser reveal failure by police to meet basic exhibit standards, false evidence – and non-disclosure. They also raise questions about who knew about the broken … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 6 Comments

Has Tasmania’s legal system gone rogue?

Posted on August 14, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. What the Attorney-General said is wrong; she does have the power to SEEK LEAVE to re-open the Sue Neill-Fraser appeal; and the DPP, Daryl Coates SC, must advise the Court of Criminal Appeal his answer to Estcourt … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 3 Comments

The riddle of the DPP

Posted on August 14, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. In an escalation of damning revelations (fifth batch), the spotlight shifts from the police investigation to then prosecutor, DPP Tim Ellis SC, and the ODPP, as lawyers continue to unpack the miscarriage of justice in the Sue … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 6 Comments

Grey dinghy, case closed

Posted on August 13, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. Garbled English aside, Tasmania’s DPP misled the appeal court – perhaps unwittingly, but significantly – as the latest Etter/Selby submission to the Attorney-General reveals, with an extract from the transcript of Sue Neill-Fraser’s appeal before Tasmania’s Court … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 11 Comments

CORRUPTION FILE: A trial derailed by sloppiness inside the Prosecutor’s office, in the Sue Neill-Fraser murder case

Posted on August 12, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. Another explosive set of documents to Tasmania’s Attorney-General from Barbara Etter APM and Hugh Selby, reveals that not just the defence but even the DPP was denied correct evidence in the murder trial of Sue Neill-Fraser.

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 19 Comments

Cardinal Pell: evidence does prove his innocence – leading jurist

Posted on August 10, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. In Pell, the Victorian Court of Appeal’s Judgement “falls apart under your eyes,” writes jurist John Finnis AC QC in the new book Current Issues in the Law of Evidence (Connor Court). The Appeal judges, it seems, … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 07 George Pell | 1 Comment

OPINION – Reopen appeal or risk cover-up? Attorney-General’s wicked problem

Posted on August 9, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. If Tasmania’s Attorney-General fails to act on last week’s Etter/Selby submission revealing the withholding of evidence by police, misleading forensic evidence and serious investigation failures into the 2009 death of Bob Chappell, her decision will be considered … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 13 Comments

The death of Bob Chappell & the damnation of TasPol: call for the Tasmanian A-G to ask to re-open the appeal of Sue Neill-Fraser

Posted on August 7, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. Evidence withheld by police, misleading forensic evidence and serious investigation failures into the death of Bob Chappell (including the unchecked mobile phone records of key witness Meaghan Vass) revealed in a damning submission calling for the Attorney … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 26 Comments

Justice may depend on where you live

Posted on August 4, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. If you’ve been wrongfully convicted, just hope you’re living in a jurisdiction with well developed correcting functions in the legal system. Differing legal mechanisms in different places produce uneven outcomes. And while Australia has yet to even … Continue reading →

Posted in CCRC, General articles | 6 Comments

TasPol failed to disclose key evidence and ran a flawed investigation into the death of Bob Chappell: report

Posted on August 2, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. A lengthy report that details flawed police investigation practices and failure to disclose evidence, has been sent to Tasmania’s Attorney General, Elise Archer, bringing to light information that has not been presented to court at either the … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 27 Comments