Category Archives: Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser

Tasmania’s legal authorities have something to say about the Sue Neill-Fraser case.

Andrew L. Urban. The Attorney-General, the DPP and the Police Commissioner have something to say about the Sue Neill-Fraser case. We report the following in the wake of much recent public unease and lack of confidence in the guilty verdict … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 9 Comments

Tas Police Commissioner said what?

Andrew L. Urban. The Mercury’s Cameron Whitely reported on September 3, 2021 (online 4.57pm) that Tasmanian Police Commissioner Darren Hine “weighed in to the ongoing debate about Sue Neill-Fraser’s murder conviction saying supporters of the convicted killer were making ‘selective … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 22 Comments

A day in the life – Sue Neill-Fraser

Incarcerated in the women’s section of Hobart’s Risdon prison since August 20, 2009, Sue Neill-Fraser is awaiting the outcome of her second appeal against the conviction for a murder she vehemently denies (and many others regard as wrongful). Security regulations … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 15 Comments

Tas. Legislative Council hears case to reopen Sue Neill-Fraser appeal

Andrew L. Urban In a significant development in the afternoon of August 31, 2021, in the Sue Neill-Fraser case, Tasmanian Legislative Council member the Hon. Michael Gaffney MLC (Ind), Member for Mersey, devoted his first adjournment speech in 13 years … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 34 Comments

“Tasmania, we’ve got you cowered”

Andrew L. Urban. What’s with the taboo? Every Tasmanian I’ve spoken to agrees: people feel intimidated talking openly about the Sue Neill-Fraser case, the long-running miscarriage of justice that is a weeping sore on Tasmania’s legal system*. Perhaps that’s why … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 25 Comments

Could a prosecutor convince a jury of murder without proof?

Andrew L. Urban.  It’s a circumstantial case: a murder has been committed but police can find no primary evidence to identify and charge a suspect. It’s not a ‘Whodunnit?’ game, but the reality in not one but two unique murder … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, Case 11 Robert Xie | 12 Comments

How and why a villain became a key witness for the prosecution

Andrew L. Urban. Arrested 12 years ago today, on August 20, 2009, for the murder of her partner Bob Chappell, Sue Neill-Fraser is still in Risdon Prison (awaiting the outcome of her last appeal, heard over five months ago), thanks … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 34 Comments

EDITORIAL New evidence demands reopening Sue Neill-Fraser appeal

Andrew L. Urban.  The cumulative effect of new evidence in the Etter/Selby dossier is devastating: we are left in no doubt that just about the entire machinery of criminal ‘justice’ in Tasmania failed Bob Chappell, Sue Neill-Fraser and the people … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 5 Comments

Reopening Sue Neill-Fraser appeal – a step by step guide

Hugh Selby. How righting the wrong done to Sue Neill-Fraser can be done with speed, civility, and be a credit to the court and the legal profession. 

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 3 Comments

Found, abandoned, contaminated, misrepresented – sad story of the red jacket

Andrew L. Urban. The last of the Etter/Selby investigative papers into the case of Sue Neill-Fraser reveal failure by police to meet basic exhibit standards, false evidence – and non-disclosure. They also raise questions about who knew about the broken … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 6 Comments