Category Archives: Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser

Tas. Legislative Council hears case to reopen Sue Neill-Fraser appeal

Andrew L. Urban In a significant development in the afternoon of August 31, 2021, in the Sue Neill-Fraser case, Tasmanian Legislative Council member the Hon. Michael Gaffney MLC (Ind), Member for Mersey, devoted his first adjournment speech in 13 years … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 34 Comments

“Tasmania, we’ve got you cowered”

Andrew L. Urban. What’s with the taboo? Every Tasmanian I’ve spoken to agrees: people feel intimidated talking openly about the Sue Neill-Fraser case, the long-running miscarriage of justice that is a weeping sore on Tasmania’s legal system*. Perhaps that’s why … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 25 Comments

Could a prosecutor convince a jury of murder without proof?

Andrew L. Urban.  It’s a circumstantial case: a murder has been committed but police can find no primary evidence to identify and charge a suspect. It’s not a ‘Whodunnit?’ game, but the reality in not one but two unique murder … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, Case 11 Robert Xie | 12 Comments

How and why a villain became a key witness for the prosecution

Andrew L. Urban. Arrested 12 years ago today, on August 20, 2009, for the murder of her partner Bob Chappell, Sue Neill-Fraser is still in Risdon Prison (awaiting the outcome of her last appeal, heard over five months ago), thanks … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 34 Comments

EDITORIAL New evidence demands reopening Sue Neill-Fraser appeal

Andrew L. Urban.  The cumulative effect of new evidence in the Etter/Selby dossier is devastating: we are left in no doubt that just about the entire machinery of criminal ‘justice’ in Tasmania failed Bob Chappell, Sue Neill-Fraser and the people … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 5 Comments

Reopening Sue Neill-Fraser appeal – a step by step guide

Hugh Selby. How righting the wrong done to Sue Neill-Fraser can be done with speed, civility, and be a credit to the court and the legal profession. 

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 3 Comments

Found, abandoned, contaminated, misrepresented – sad story of the red jacket

Andrew L. Urban. The last of the Etter/Selby investigative papers into the case of Sue Neill-Fraser reveal failure by police to meet basic exhibit standards, false evidence – and non-disclosure. They also raise questions about who knew about the broken … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 6 Comments

Has Tasmania’s legal system gone rogue?

Andrew L. Urban. What the Attorney-General said is wrong; she does have the power to SEEK LEAVE to re-open the Sue Neill-Fraser appeal; and the DPP, Daryl Coates SC, must advise the Court of Criminal Appeal his answer to Estcourt … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 3 Comments

The riddle of the DPP

Andrew L. Urban. In an escalation of damning revelations (fifth batch), the spotlight shifts from the police investigation to then prosecutor, DPP Tim Ellis SC, and the ODPP, as lawyers continue to unpack the miscarriage of justice in the Sue … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 6 Comments

Grey dinghy, case closed

Andrew L. Urban. Garbled English aside, Tasmania’s DPP misled the appeal court – perhaps unwittingly, but significantly – as the latest Etter/Selby submission to the Attorney-General reveals, with an extract from the transcript of Sue Neill-Fraser’s appeal before Tasmania’s Court … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 11 Comments