-
Sign Up
Categories
- Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser (245)
- Case 02 Henry Keogh (11)
- Case 03 David Szach (3)
- Case 04 Gordon Wood (7)
- Case 05 Derek Bromley (26)
- Case 06 'Paul' (9)
- Case 07 George Pell (10)
- Case 08 Sarah May Ward (1)
- Case 09 Joby Rowe (1)
- Case 10 Steven Fennell (1)
- Case 11 Robert Xie (25)
- Case 12 Bradley Murdoch (2)
- Case 13 Robert Farquharson (8)
- Case 14 Scott Austic (2)
- Case 15 John Fleming (1)
- Case 16 Eddie Howard (1)
- Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg (23)
- Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann (34)
- Case 19 Marco Rusterholz (5)
- Case 20 The Cook family (1)
- Case 21 'Mr & Mrs X' (1)
- Case 22 Noel Greenaway (12)
- Case 23 Lucy Letby (2)
- Case 24 Fr Gordon MacRae (3)
- CCRC (21)
- Forensic evidence (13)
- General articles (186)
- Shaken Baby Syndrome (5)
- Uncategorized (9)
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Geri Rizzo on Behind the scenes at #MeToo sexual assault lawfare
- Heinrich on Behind the scenes at #MeToo sexual assault lawfare
- Leonid Lerner on Bradley Murdoch – how DNA may have misled the jury
- andrew on The Staircase – step by step injustice
- Sharon Montour on The Staircase – step by step injustice
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- February 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
Meta
Category Archives: Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
Tas. Legislative Council hears case to reopen Sue Neill-Fraser appeal
Andrew L. Urban In a significant development in the afternoon of August 31, 2021, in the Sue Neill-Fraser case, Tasmanian Legislative Council member the Hon. Michael Gaffney MLC (Ind), Member for Mersey, devoted his first adjournment speech in 13 years … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
34 Comments
“Tasmania, we’ve got you cowered”
Andrew L. Urban. What’s with the taboo? Every Tasmanian I’ve spoken to agrees: people feel intimidated talking openly about the Sue Neill-Fraser case, the long-running miscarriage of justice that is a weeping sore on Tasmania’s legal system*. Perhaps that’s why … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
25 Comments
Could a prosecutor convince a jury of murder without proof?
Andrew L. Urban. It’s a circumstantial case: a murder has been committed but police can find no primary evidence to identify and charge a suspect. It’s not a ‘Whodunnit?’ game, but the reality in not one but two unique murder … Continue reading
How and why a villain became a key witness for the prosecution
Andrew L. Urban. Arrested 12 years ago today, on August 20, 2009, for the murder of her partner Bob Chappell, Sue Neill-Fraser is still in Risdon Prison (awaiting the outcome of her last appeal, heard over five months ago), thanks … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
34 Comments
EDITORIAL New evidence demands reopening Sue Neill-Fraser appeal
Andrew L. Urban. The cumulative effect of new evidence in the Etter/Selby dossier is devastating: we are left in no doubt that just about the entire machinery of criminal ‘justice’ in Tasmania failed Bob Chappell, Sue Neill-Fraser and the people … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
5 Comments
Reopening Sue Neill-Fraser appeal – a step by step guide
Hugh Selby. How righting the wrong done to Sue Neill-Fraser can be done with speed, civility, and be a credit to the court and the legal profession.
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
3 Comments
Found, abandoned, contaminated, misrepresented – sad story of the red jacket
Andrew L. Urban. The last of the Etter/Selby investigative papers into the case of Sue Neill-Fraser reveal failure by police to meet basic exhibit standards, false evidence – and non-disclosure. They also raise questions about who knew about the broken … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
6 Comments
Has Tasmania’s legal system gone rogue?
Andrew L. Urban. What the Attorney-General said is wrong; she does have the power to SEEK LEAVE to re-open the Sue Neill-Fraser appeal; and the DPP, Daryl Coates SC, must advise the Court of Criminal Appeal his answer to Estcourt … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
3 Comments
The riddle of the DPP
Andrew L. Urban. In an escalation of damning revelations (fifth batch), the spotlight shifts from the police investigation to then prosecutor, DPP Tim Ellis SC, and the ODPP, as lawyers continue to unpack the miscarriage of justice in the Sue … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
6 Comments
Grey dinghy, case closed
Andrew L. Urban. Garbled English aside, Tasmania’s DPP misled the appeal court – perhaps unwittingly, but significantly – as the latest Etter/Selby submission to the Attorney-General reveals, with an extract from the transcript of Sue Neill-Fraser’s appeal before Tasmania’s Court … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
11 Comments