Author Archives: andrew

Witness of Fact – “one of the most significant books in the genre of wrongful convictions analysis”

Posted on January 24, 2022 by andrew

There is still time for South Australian state officials (both forensic and legal) to ‘come clean’ about past failures and fulfil their duty of disclosure to the court regarding former forensic pathologist Dr Colin Manock, says DR BOB MOLES in … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 2 Comments

Australia Day 2022 Hobart – marks dark day for justice

Posted on January 21, 2022 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban.  Was it Sam Devine who killed Bob Chappell 13 years ago this Australia Day? Was Sue Neill-Fraser wrongfully convicted of murdering Bob and jailed for 23 years? These are key questions raised by eye-witness testimony and legal … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 29 Comments

Legal academic identifies errors in judgement of Sue Neill-Fraser’s failed appeal

Posted on January 13, 2022 by andrew

Sue Neill-Fraser is now seeking leave to appeal to the High Court to overturn her 2010 conviction for the murder of her partner Bob Chappell, after her 2020 appeal was dismissed 2:1 by the Tasmanian Court of Appeal. Edited extracts … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 10 Comments

Sue Neill-Fraser looking to High Court for justice

Posted on January 12, 2022 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban Sue Neill-Fraser’s anticipated application seeking leave to appeal to The High Court has now been lodged, hoping to overturn the Tasmanian Court of Appeal dismissal of her case on November 30, 2021, asking the High Court to … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 23 Comments

Bromley conviction based on false and misleading evidence & the State knew it

Posted on January 4, 2022 by andrew

A South Australian man, Derek Bromley, has now served 38 years in prison and “throughout that time the state knew that the conviction had been obtained through evidence which was false and misleading insofar as the status of the chief … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 05 Derek Bromley | 3 Comments

Will the legal system in Australia make 2022 a year of reform?

Posted on January 4, 2022 by andrew

Andrew L Urban. A legal system not subject to independent scrutiny is weakened, inhibited from needed reform, and hindered in the evolution to keep in step with other institutions and community values. 

Posted in General articles | 3 Comments

Another ‘bunny boiler’ who must be believed

Posted on January 2, 2022 by andrew

Bettina Arndt Four days before Christmas (2021) one of our elite Melbourne universities committed an act of total bastardry. They announced they were firing a tutor working in one of their colleges. His employment was terminated forthwith – just in … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 15 Comments

Pulitzer-winning Greenwald exposes anti-Assange lies on MSNBC

Posted on December 17, 2021 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. December 17, 2021: Deconstructing a two minute clip from MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Glenn Greenwald reveals Joe Scarborough’s anti-Assange lies, as Assange awaits extradition from the UK to the US – on charges Greenwald … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 1 Comment

Hobart rally calling for Sue Neill-Fraser inquiry

Posted on December 16, 2021 by andrew

Sue Neill-Fraser supporters will hold a rally on Saturday December 18, 2021, calling for an inquiry into her case. Speakers at the Rally will commence at 11.00am and include Andrew Wilkie MP, Lara Giddings, former Tasmanian Premier, and Sarah Bowles, … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 7 Comments

NSW A-G in ‘state sanctioned abuse’ over Folbigg

Posted on December 15, 2021 by andrew

A ground-breaking development within clinical practice has prompted Kathleen Folbigg’s lawyer Rhanee Rego to accuse NSW Attorney-General Mark Speakman of failing to act on the evidence “which unequivocally supports innocence” without anything to contradict it. She told Lawyers Weekly that … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg | 1 Comment