Author Archives: andrew

Bruce Lehrmann “is not a rapist” – Rule of Law Institute

Posted on June 5, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban Bruce Lehrmann has not been convicted of rape – yet his name and reputation have suffered as if he had been. It was in the civil proceedings that Justice Lee ruled in favour of Network Ten and … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 12 Comments

Mothers of sons: beware!

Posted on June 3, 2024 by andrew

“The morning after my son’s 18th birthday he was charged with rape,” one mother, Erin, reports. Sexual assault allegations against males are easy to make … and all too often damage the reputation of the accused, even if those who … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 7 Comments

‘This cannot stand’ – Bruce Lehrmann

Posted on May 31, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban.  Justice  Lee’s judgement is not reliant on any arguments by any of the parties, according to Bruce Lehrmann’s notice of appeal against Justice Lee’s judgement in his failed defamation trial: ‘this cannot stand’ is his stance, broke … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 7 Comments

Judge Instructs Jurors They Need Not Believe Trump Is Guilty To Convict Him

Posted on May 30, 2024 by andrew

NEW YORK, NY — As the criminal trial involving former President Donald Trump winds to a close, the presiding judge instructed jurors that they don’t have to believe Trump is guilty to convict him. (The Babylon Bee, May 30, 2024) 

Posted in General articles | 27 Comments

Alabama Attorney-General catches Tasmania’s stonewall disease

Posted on May 28, 2024 by andrew

Alabama’s Attorney-General does a Tasmania’s Attorney-General … dismissing calls for a new trial even after an investigation by a county DA into a murder conviction. It’s the case of a man on death row, after evidence is uncovered of $5,000 … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 9 Comments

Skeletons in the legal closet – look inside

Posted on May 27, 2024 by andrew

They are prisoners. But they are wrongfully convicted, as we have shown here and elsewhere, supported by legal argument. They are skeletons in the legal closet; catastrophic failures- – but the legal system seems unable and/or unwilling to admit error … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, Case 05 Derek Bromley, Case 11 Robert Xie, Case 13 Robert Farquharson, Case 19 Marco Rusterholz, Case 22 Noel Greenaway | 4 Comments

The Sofronoff Express at Platform ‘Speed’

Posted on May 24, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. The Magna Carta meets the ACT’s legal system on the Sofronoff express in what promises to be a historic and relevant journey into pretty wild legal territory. That territory is strewn with the carcasses of legal reputations, … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, Case 05 Derek Bromley, Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 4 Comments

Conviction based on fraud, appeal rejections unlawful

Posted on May 22, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. The tone is measured, professional, but the content is explosive, exposing the litany of judicial errors that have contributed to Derek Bromley being stuck in jail for the past 40 years – for a murder conviction that … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 05 Derek Bromley | 6 Comments

The stonewall of justice

Posted on May 16, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. Call me naïve. It came as a shocking realisation, at 13:33 on May 16, 2024, to be exact. I’ve been wrong all this time. Before that moment, I actually imagined that the legal system, often mischaracterised as … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 10 Comments

Downside of Lyn’s Law

Posted on May 11, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban  Convicted murderers have a choice: reveal the whereabouts of their victims’ bodies or lose access to parole. Wrongfully convicted murderers have no such choice. 

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 26 Comments