Wrongful Convictions Report

Andrew L. Urban

What went wrong? That’s the question that the criminal justice system does not often ask and therefore doesn’t answer when wrongful convictions are revealed.

Prevention is so much better than cure, especially in a legal system which deprives the convicted of resources and the voice to be heard. The resistance to learning from mistakes prior to trial is compounded by a resistance to correct them post conviction.

There is no self correcting mechanism in the criminal justice system, other than an imperfect, slow and combersome appellate process; there is no equivalent to consumer protection that is obligatory elsewhere. Keith A Findlay, co-founder of the Wisconsin Innocence Project argues this very clearly in ‘Learning from our Mistakes’:

Continue reading →

By Andrew L. Urban

She is wheeled into the clinical surrounds of the Supreme Court in Hobart in a wheelchair and positioned in front of the empty jury benches, facing the witness box. Sue Neill-Fraser’s demeanour is low key, her little smile vague. It’s October 2017 and she’s been in prison since her arrest more than eight years earlier, in August 2009, when she was a healthy 55 year old. Two prison officers escort her.

The public gallery is full of her supporters and the media. In front of them are the two costly barristers and their two expensive associates, the two instructing solicitors – and scattered around the court, the wage-earning court staff. Sitting in his elevated isolation is Judge Michael Brett, presiding over Neill-Fraser’s appeal. Well, not her actual appeal, her request for leave to appeal.

Continue reading →

By Andrew L. Urban

The WA police defamed an innocent man by publicly naming him soon after starting their investigation as the only suspect in his wife’s murder. He was eventually (three years later) charged, tried and acquitted. Twice. He has now sued the State – and won. The killer is still at large. That’s what comes from pursuing a conviction instead of searching for the truth.

It is rare that a defamation case shines so strongly and tellingly on the infamous police investigation failures generated by what is known as ‘tunnel vision’. The clarity of the examination of tunnel vision in this case is the valuable by-product of the successful defamation action brought by Lloyd Rayney against the WA Government, which concluded in December 2017 with damages of over $2.6 million awarded to Rayney, who had been arrested for the murder of his wife, Corryn.

Continue reading →

Innocent people – at least 71 known*, the total unknowable – have been held or are stuck in Australian jails on lengthy sentences for murders or rapes they did not commit. This comes as no surprise to those who, like multi award winning journalist and legal historian Evan Whitton, consider the adversarial system Australia has imported from Britain a disaster for justice, nothing more than a permit for lawyers to operate as a cartel, in which truth is not the ultimate objective. Winning is.

Here, in a selection of extracts from Whitton’s infinitely researched and damning work, Our Corrupt Legal System (Book Pal, 2009), is the evidence – often in their own words: lawyers are trained liars.

Continue reading →

By Andrew L. Urban.

As Gordon Wood, acquitted in 2014 of murdering his girlfriend Caroline Byrne in 1995, awaits the decision (expected by end of 2017) on his recently concluded malicious prosecution case against the State of NSW, at least two other murder convictions deserve scrutiny.

Many people find it difficult to believe that our criminal justice system is capable of repeated and gross errors. But the example of just three cases show how the prosecution (protected by professional immunity) sought and secured a conviction by applying three ‘imperatives’ in each case.

Continue reading →

By Andrew L. Urban

A man convicted of murder is still in jail after 33 years, 11 years after he was eligible for parole, because he will not relent on his claim of innocence. He has always maintained that he was wrongly convicted so he is not in a position to apologise (show remorse) or state that he won’t do it again. The prison authorities take the view that he is in denial, because he has been convicted.

The key evidence against him is an eyewitness account which was given by a person suffering psychosis and hallucinations at the time, and forensic evidence that has been totally discredited. His previous appeals failed and he is now appealing again, under new legislation.

Continue reading →