Category Archives: Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser

Sue Neill-Fraser not a stereotypical killer – Parole Board

Posted on December 15, 2022 by andrew

Tasmania’s Parole Board has published its reasons for releasing Sue Neill-Fraser on parole after 13 years (of a 23 year sentence), and noted that she did not present like a stereotypical killer. The Parole Board said Mr Chappell’s death was … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 26 Comments

Strictly legal – seminar provides lesson in law for judge

Posted on November 28, 2022 by andrew

The President of the Law Society and the Attorney-General of Tasmania must provide legal references if they disagree with the points raised by Dr BOB MOLES* in his address at the seminar, Lifting the Lid on Miscarriages of Justice – … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 23 Comments

Everyone pays the price for silence … Tasmania warned

Posted on November 27, 2022 by andrew

The Hobart Mercury’s crime reporter David Killick’s Nov. 26, 2022, scathing analysis of Tasmanian Attorney-General’s latest decision makes sobering reading.

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, General articles | 15 Comments

Tasmania’s O’Farrell Review – questions raised by MP

Posted on November 26, 2022 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban A series of probing questions have been placed on the Legislative Council Notice Paper about the already disgraced O’Farrell Review into illegal surveillance in Risdon prison, a fallout of the Sue Neill-Fraser case. 

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 10 Comments

Why the courts have not silenced the uproar over Sue Neill-Fraser case

Posted on November 18, 2022 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. Tasmania’s legal establishment wants to shut it down but the continuing uproar of dissent over the demonstrable wrongful conviction of Sue Neill-Fraser will not be silenced. As we show here, there is a great deal to uproar … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 18 Comments

Sue Neill-Fraser injustice product of ‘our Tasmanian legal fraternity’

Posted on November 15, 2022 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. Former Hobart prosecutor Tony Jacobs has reviewed the case of Sue Neill-Fraser and found many reasons for the conviction to be overturned, urging the Law Society to “help correct this injustice, the product of our Tasmanian legal … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 29 Comments

Review of illegal surveillance possibly illegal, too

Posted on November 11, 2022 by andrew

A media release by the Independent member for Nelson, Tasmania, reveals the O’Farrell Review into the illegal prison surveillance of Jeff Thompson would possibly be illegal itself. The following is a media release issued yesterday by Nelson Independent, Meg Webb, … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 9 Comments

Kathleen Folbigg conviction next under microscope – others on the way

Posted on October 31, 2022 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban The high profile case of Kathleen Folbigg’s 2003 conviction for the murder of her very young children will be under the microscope again in a second inquiry starting November 14, 2022 (listed for two weeks), with former … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, Case 05 Derek Bromley, Case 11 Robert Xie, Case 13 Robert Farquharson, Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg | 15 Comments

Sue Neill-Fraser out on parole

Posted on October 4, 2022 by andrew

Sue Neill-Fraser was released on parole this morning and driven to the parole office in Hobart by her two daughters, Sarah Bowles and Emma Fraser-Meeker, reported the ABC. 

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 67 Comments

The truth will set you free … from totalitarianism – Tasmania please note

Posted on October 3, 2022 by andrew

“When a society loses the desire to know the truth, that is a precursor to totalitarianism,” observed author, Holocaust survivor and political philosopher Hanna Arendt (1906 – 1975). Tasmanian society is now seeing that observation come closer to realisation around … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 17 Comments