-
Sign Up
Categories
- Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser (251)
- Case 02 Henry Keogh (14)
- Case 03 David Szach (4)
- Case 04 Gordon Wood (10)
- Case 05 Derek Bromley (29)
- Case 06 'Paul' (10)
- Case 07 George Pell (10)
- Case 08 Sarah May Ward (1)
- Case 09 Joby Rowe (1)
- Case 10 Steven Fennell (2)
- Case 11 Robert Xie (40)
- Case 12 Bradley Murdoch (2)
- Case 13 Robert Farquharson (10)
- Case 14 Scott Austic (2)
- Case 15 John Fleming (1)
- Case 16 Eddie Howard (1)
- Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg (25)
- Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann (36)
- Case 19 Marco Rusterholz (5)
- Case 20 The Cook family (1)
- Case 21 'Mr & Mrs X' (1)
- Case 22 Noel Greenaway (16)
- Case 23 Lucy Letby (2)
- Case 24 Fr Gordon MacRae (4)
- Case 25 Cedric and Noelene Jordan (1)
- CCRC (22)
- Forensic evidence (13)
- General articles (194)
- Shaken Baby Syndrome (5)
- Uncategorized (11)
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Michael Waters on Lucky girl, that Brittany
- Anne on Bradley Murdoch – how DNA may have misled the jury
- Anne Webster on Bradley Murdoch – how DNA may have misled the jury
- Steven Dyson on Derek Bromley granted parole after 40 years
- Nina on Bradley Murdoch – how DNA may have misled the jury
Archives
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- February 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
Meta
Category Archives: Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
Police respond to Meaghan Vass admission on 60 Minutes
Andrew L. Urban. In the wake of Meaghan Vass admitting her presence at the murder of Bob Chappell on Australia Day 2009, during her interview on 60 Minutes (Sunday, March 10, 2019) – contradicting the murder conviction of Sue Neill-Fraser … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
67 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser – In steps of Lindy Chamberlain?
When her guilty verdict was no longer tenable, Lindy Chamberlain was released before her appeal was heard. Could Sue Neill-Fraser ask for the same? Legal academic, Dr Bob Moles*, an authority on wrongful convictions, sets out the scenario, in view of … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
9 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser innocent? Witness Vass says so on 60 Minutes
Andrew L. Urban. In her emotional 60 Minutes interview last night (Sunday, March 10, 2019, Channel 9), Meaghan Vass told the truth – ‘the objective evidence backs it up’ as Robert Richter QC put it: she witnessed Bob Chappell scuffle … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
19 Comments
Tasmanian justice system self-harmed
Andrew L. Urban. Tasmania’s justice system is taking a battering all of its own making as the truth bubbles to the surface in the much debated and badly miscarried Sue Neill-Fraser case. In denial for a decade about the validity … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
13 Comments
Meaghan Vass – (inconvenient) eyewitness to murder
Andrew L. Urban. On 60 Minutes tomorrow (8.30pm, Sunday, March 10, 2019, Channel Nine), Meaghan Vass will confirm that convicted and jailed Sue Neill-Fraser did not kill Bob Chappell on Australia Day 2009. Vass knows because she was an eye witness, … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
43 Comments
Undercurrent – the wash swamps the conviction
Andrew L. Urban. Journalists (including this one*) have been saying it for years: the 2010 Sue Neill-Fraser murder conviction is wrong. Meaghan Vass’ DNA found at the crime scene (the yacht Four Winds) should have been urgently & thoroughly investigated. … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
29 Comments
Undercurrent Ep 6 showcased at AIDC
The final episode of Undercurrent (7 Network), delving into the case of Sue Neill-Fraser, will be showcased at the Australian International Documentary Conference in Melbourne tonight (March 5, 2019), followed by a Q&A with producer/director Eve Ash and Executive Producer … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
24 Comments
Undercurrent – the end is nigh
Andrew L. Urban. At around 6 minutes from the start of the final episode of Undercurrent (7 Network, Wednesday, March 6, 2019), a nervy Meaghan Vass arrives for a crucial tell-all interview with Colin McLaren in a Hobart hotel room, cameras … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
62 Comments
Death on the Derwent: a crime writer’s probe into the Sue Neill-Fraser conviction
Andrew L. Urban Death on the Derwent – by Robin Bowles Scribe Publications, February 19, 2019, 384 pp, $32.99 ISBN:9781925713176 Robin Bowles has been writing crime books for 20 years. She lived and worked in Tasmania from 1977 to 1987; … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
4 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser case: “tainted view” v facts
Andrew L. Urban. In the view of some, it seems the ‘defence’ perspective of the murder conviction of Sue Neill-Fraser is a ‘tainted view’. Tainted with the facts, perhaps? One reader has articulated this in the comments thread under my … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
16 Comments