-
Sign Up
Categories
- Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser (251)
- Case 02 Henry Keogh (14)
- Case 03 David Szach (4)
- Case 04 Gordon Wood (10)
- Case 05 Derek Bromley (29)
- Case 06 'Paul' (10)
- Case 07 George Pell (10)
- Case 08 Sarah May Ward (1)
- Case 09 Joby Rowe (1)
- Case 10 Steven Fennell (2)
- Case 11 Robert Xie (40)
- Case 12 Bradley Murdoch (2)
- Case 13 Robert Farquharson (10)
- Case 14 Scott Austic (2)
- Case 15 John Fleming (1)
- Case 16 Eddie Howard (1)
- Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg (25)
- Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann (36)
- Case 19 Marco Rusterholz (5)
- Case 20 The Cook family (1)
- Case 21 'Mr & Mrs X' (1)
- Case 22 Noel Greenaway (16)
- Case 23 Lucy Letby (2)
- Case 24 Fr Gordon MacRae (4)
- Case 25 Cedric and Noelene Jordan (1)
- CCRC (22)
- Forensic evidence (13)
- General articles (194)
- Shaken Baby Syndrome (5)
- Uncategorized (11)
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Michael Waters on Lucky girl, that Brittany
- Anne on Bradley Murdoch – how DNA may have misled the jury
- Anne Webster on Bradley Murdoch – how DNA may have misled the jury
- Steven Dyson on Derek Bromley granted parole after 40 years
- Nina on Bradley Murdoch – how DNA may have misled the jury
Archives
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- February 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
Meta
Category Archives: Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
Sue Neill-Fraser case contradicts formal logic, analysis shows – part 2
In the 2010 trial of Sue Neill-Fraser, there was an absence of evidentiary proof for establishing the Major Premise of the crime – an essential fact for a valid inference of guilt, writes BENJAMIN DEAN,* in this 3-part analysis of … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
5 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser case contradicts formal logic, analysis shows – part 1
In the 2010 trial of Sue Neill-Fraser, there was an absence of evidentiary proof for establishing the Major Premise of the crime – an essential fact for a valid inference of guilt, writes BENJAMIN DEAN,* in this 3-part analysis of … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
16 Comments
Justice delayed … and delayed …. by Covid19
Andrew L. Urban. One of the “much loved and respected” inmates of Hobart’s Risdon women’s prison, Sue Neill-Fraser, has had to keep deferring her hope of regaining her freedom after 11 years incarceration; she is collateral damage of the Covid19 … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
10 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser – a wrongful arrest and 11 years later Part 2: a remedy
Andrew L. Urban. The police investigation that led to Neill-Fraser’s arrest was irredeemably flawed, as we reported in Part 1 and it led to a train wreck of a trial that mocks the integrity of the criminal justice system. There … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
8 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser – a wrongful arrest and 11 years later Part 1
Andrew L. Urban. August 2009 was unusually wet, windy and warm for Tasmania – and wrongful conviction was in the air. Sue Neill-Fraser’s arrest on Thursday, August 20, 2009 – exactly 11 years ago today – for the murder of … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
15 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser ‘much loved and respected’ by inmates
Two former prison inmates attending the Hobart vigil held on Saturday August 1, 2020 to mark the 4,000 days Sue Neill-Fraser has spent in jail, were interviewed by the Hobart Mercury’s Sally Glaetzer and the story was headline news in … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
9 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser trial flashback – the defence closing submission
Marking 11 years since her arrest (August 20, 2009) and while awaiting the oft-delayed start of Sue Neill-Fraser’s further appeal against her conviction for the murder of Bob Chappell (now scheduled for November 2, 2020), we publish the transcript of … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
6 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser August appeal date uncertain
The directions hearing in the Tasmanian Supreme Court before Justice Wood on Friday, July 3, 2020 was unable to settle on 17 August as the start date for the long awaited appeal against her 2010 murder conviction, reports Rosie Crumpton-Crook, … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
28 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser and expectations of the appeal judges
Andrew L. Urban. Three Tasmanian judges will hear Sue Neill-Fraser’s new appeal later this year against her conviction for the 2009 murder of her partner Bob Chappell, amid concerns that the appeal should be heard not by local but by … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
32 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser & a legal system lacking morality
Andrew L. Urban. The foundation stone of the law is morality. All laws have a moral basis or background – but not all individuals and/or institutions within the legal system do. Moral considerations ought to inform legal considerations. In the … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
16 Comments