-
Sign Up
Categories
- Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser (245)
- Case 02 Henry Keogh (11)
- Case 03 David Szach (3)
- Case 04 Gordon Wood (7)
- Case 05 Derek Bromley (26)
- Case 06 'Paul' (9)
- Case 07 George Pell (10)
- Case 08 Sarah May Ward (1)
- Case 09 Joby Rowe (1)
- Case 10 Steven Fennell (1)
- Case 11 Robert Xie (25)
- Case 12 Bradley Murdoch (2)
- Case 13 Robert Farquharson (8)
- Case 14 Scott Austic (2)
- Case 15 John Fleming (1)
- Case 16 Eddie Howard (1)
- Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg (23)
- Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann (34)
- Case 19 Marco Rusterholz (5)
- Case 20 The Cook family (1)
- Case 21 'Mr & Mrs X' (1)
- Case 22 Noel Greenaway (12)
- Case 23 Lucy Letby (2)
- Case 24 Fr Gordon MacRae (3)
- CCRC (21)
- Forensic evidence (13)
- General articles (186)
- Shaken Baby Syndrome (5)
- Uncategorized (9)
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Heinrich on A thousand reasons for Lehrmann appeal
- Peter Gill on Lucy Letby: Did she do it?
- Peter on Cross checking
- Peter Gill on Lucy Letby: Did she do it?
- andrew on Lucy Letby: Did she do it?
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- February 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
Meta
Category Archives: Shaken Baby Syndrome
Now it’s cancel forensic science, champion junk
Andrew L. Urban. “The events surrounding the retraction of a properly peer reviewed journal article point to a forensic science community in Australia that can over-ride scientific publishing processes in order to suppress criticism.” So conclude Chris Brook, Niels Lynoe, … Continue reading
Posted in Shaken Baby Syndrome
3 Comments
Dead babies, experts dead wrong, in deadly consensus
They call it Shaken Baby Syndrome, an outdated medical consensus that is just junk science yet it deprives parents of their living children. Last week’s tragic story of Michigan’s Tonia Miller on the online journal On Shaken Baby is another … Continue reading
Posted in Shaken Baby Syndrome
2 Comments
‘Shaken baby syndrome’ evidence reliability shaken
Victoria’s highest court has flagged serious concerns about the scientific diagnosis known as “shaken baby syndrome”, which has been used to prosecute and jail a number of young men for child homicide and abuse in recent years, according to an … Continue reading
Posted in Shaken Baby Syndrome
Leave a comment
Shaken Baby Syndrome convictions rely on junk science and tunnel vision
As we have reported, the reliability of forensic evidence is increasingly questioned; and Shaken Baby Syndrome convictions rely on junk science and tunnel vision, writes Chris Brook* in this extract from his latest blog.
Posted in Shaken Baby Syndrome
14 Comments
Is there evidentiary basis for shaken baby syndrome? The conviction of Joby Rowe
Chris Brook. Joby Rowe’s 2018 conviction for child homicide was based solely on forensic evidence that openly and overtly lacked any scientific basis, with expert opinions based instead on confession studies. This case raises fundamental questions for forensic science in … Continue reading
Posted in Case 09 Joby Rowe, Shaken Baby Syndrome
9 Comments