Second inquiry into 2003 Folbigg conviction – what’s the hurry?

Posted on May 19, 2022 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban.

We report (sourced with thanks from The Australian, May 18, 2022) and comment (in red) on the latest development in this case.  Continue reading →

Posted in Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg | 18 Comments

There but for the grace of God go … you

Posted on May 2, 2022 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban.

The High Court adjourned for just four minutes before resuming at 2.45pm on Wednesday, September 11, 2019, with a unanimous decision that Steven Fennell’s appeal against his murder conviction should be upheld. A verdict of acquittal was entered. “I was in my cell about to eat my yoghurt when prison officers came to the door and said, `you’re going’,” he told The Courier-Mail.  Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 40 Comments

ZELENSKY, the first book about the world’s newest hero, authored by Australians

Posted on April 23, 2022 by andrew

Ukraine’s most popular comedic actor was an unlikely President of his country. And now even more improbably, Volodymyr Zelensky has become the world’s most celebrated statesman. Yet more improbably, the first book about him comes from Australia.  Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 27 Comments

Online discussions on miscarriages of justice with Dr Bob Moles

Posted on April 19, 2022 by andrew

Three miscarriages of justice – the cases of Derek Bromley, Sue Neill-Fraser and Kathleen Folbigg – will each be the subject of a one-hour online discussion led by Dr Bob Moles, for the South Australian Workers Educational Association (WEA). Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 8 Comments

Can the system minimise irrational jury verdicts?

Posted on April 11, 2022 by andrew

Jurors don’t have the intelligence to provide sound reasons for their collective decisions, according to the legal fraternity’s outdated rules. There is a better way, argues ANDREW L. URBAN.  Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 11 Comments

The evil genius of the feminist enterprise

Posted on April 7, 2022 by andrew

Police officers across the country all reported last week that they are told never to take action against a woman caught out making false violence or rape allegations, lest punishment of false accusers deters genuine victims from coming forward, reports BETTINA ARNDT, as she recounts a case where police and the DPP ignored clear video evidence revealing a man’s former wife’s rape and assault allegations to be “demonstrably false” said the judge. Yet she suffered no adverse consequences.  Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 7 Comments

Dear Attorney – your silence is damning

Posted on April 5, 2022 by andrew

We publish this self-explanatory letter we wrote to Tasmania’s Attorney-General, The Hon. Elise Archer, to demonstrate the State’s callous disregard for transparency and for ensuring that justice is served in the case of Sue Neill-Fraser.  Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 29 Comments

(Mis)handling expert evidence – test for the courts

Posted on April 4, 2022 by andrew

A paper # by The Hon Justice Peter Davis and barrister J.R. Jones puts the spotlight on expert evidence – and shows how inadmissible expert evidence can sneak into court. Dr Bob Moles ## adds the shocking example of the Sue Neill-Fraser case, where “the entirety of the forensic evidence was a complete shambles … that warrants the conviction being overturned,” and is an embarrassment to Tasmania’s legal system.  Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 5 Comments

Jury selection 101

Posted on April 2, 2022 by andrew

Who gets to pick the jury and how? Who can object? Can we trust the selection system?  Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 17 Comments

Did Inspector Powell have the answers in the murder investigation? ‘Who knows?’

Posted on March 30, 2022 by andrew

Retired Hobart police Inspector Peter Powell led the investigation into the disappearance-turned-murder of Bob Chappell on Australia Day 2009, which led to the arrest and 2010 conviction of Sue Neill-Fraser for Chappell’s murder. But in interviews between 2012 and 2016, Powell’s responses were peppered with ‘who knows?’.  Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 23 Comments