Category Archives: Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser

Clayton’s review into police prison surveillance

The terms of reference for an inquiry into the unlawful use of surveillance devices in Risdon Prison downplay any wrongdoing by Tasmania Police involved in the operation, reports David Killick in the Hobart Mercury today (Sept. 30, 2022). 

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 18 Comments

Parole for Sue Neill-Fraser doesn’t correct the miscarriage of justice

Andrew L. Urban.  She’s on parole. But Sue Neill-Fraser’s 2010 conviction for the 2009 murder of her partner Bob Chappell remains undisturbed – and controversially unjust. Her two appeals were dismissed; her two High Court applications seeking leave to appeal … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 32 Comments

Sue Neill-Fraser paroled

It’s been a bitter-sweet day for wrongful convictions today (16/9/22) with Derek Bromley’s leave to appeal his 38 year old murder conviction referred to the full Court (as we reported earlier) and Sue Neill-Fraser granted parole after 13 years in … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 40 Comments

Illegal TasPol snooping to be reviewed by TasPol defender Michael O’Farrell SC

Andrew L. Urban. That great State of renowned legal probity and justice, Tasmania, has announced its response to Brett J’s judgement that police illegally recorded prison conversations for two months: it has tasked a defender of TasPol to conduct an … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 63 Comments

The lawless country?

Andrew L. Urban. You might sleep soundly in the belief that Australia has a robust, fair and competent criminal justice system. Dream on. The System itself sometimes contributes to lawlessness in the administration of justice. 

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, Case 05 Derek Bromley, Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg, General articles | 8 Comments

“impugned evidence was obtained unlawfully” against lawyer Jeff Thompson says judge

Protection from unlawful surveillance by law enforcement is of significant public importance, stated Brett J in his judgement against TasPol in the five year old case of Hobart lawyer Jeff Thompson, which was dropped (nolle prosequi) on August 8, 2022, … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 12 Comments

Integrity Commission Tasmania complaint & response

Andrew L. Urban. The High Court’s dismissal of Sue Neill-Fraser’s application seeking leave to appeal (August 12, 2022) leaves unresolved the matter of inadmissible forensic evidence at trial and the lack of disclosure of that error to the courts. Flinders … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 34 Comments

A proven murderer? Or a catastrophic failure of the legal system?

Andrew L. Urban. Since her arrest for murder 13 years ago tomorrow (20/8/2022), up to the latest High Court decision a week ago, Sue Neill-Fraser’s case has moved slowly through the courts. The 2010 trial, the appeal, the seeking leave … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 19 Comments

High Court fails again on justice being seen to be done

By CLA President Dr Kristine Klugman and CEO Bill Rowlings The High Court – judges Stephen Gageler, Simon Steward and Jacqueline Gleeson – has refused Sue Neill-Fraser leave-to-appeal her murder conviction on Friday 12 August 2022 after a 45-minute hearing, … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 30 Comments

Analysis of a press report on the High Court decision re Sue Neill-Fraser

Andrew L. Urban. Here is an example of why the average person in the street cannot rely on press reports to be fully informed about matters relevant to wrongful convictions.

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 20 Comments