The Sue Neill-Fraser appeal will not be heard until next year (2020). Directions hearing at 4 pm today was before Wood J., Coates and Shapiro for the Crown. Chris Carr for Sue Neill Fraser appeared from Melbourne via video. Her lawyers have until 28 October to get their appeal book index in (and appeal books shortly thereafter) and the DPP has until 20 December to consider it and get his material in. Extra time might be needed re Agreed Facts. Early iIndications are that the appeal may go for one to two weeks. Wood indicated that it appeared that the appeal would go ahead in early 2020. Her Honour set the matter down for a directions hearing to check progress for 4 pm on 12 November 2019.
-
Sign Up
Categories
- Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser (245)
- Case 02 Henry Keogh (11)
- Case 03 David Szach (3)
- Case 04 Gordon Wood (7)
- Case 05 Derek Bromley (26)
- Case 06 'Paul' (9)
- Case 07 George Pell (10)
- Case 08 Sarah May Ward (1)
- Case 09 Joby Rowe (1)
- Case 10 Steven Fennell (1)
- Case 11 Robert Xie (25)
- Case 12 Bradley Murdoch (2)
- Case 13 Robert Farquharson (8)
- Case 14 Scott Austic (2)
- Case 15 John Fleming (1)
- Case 16 Eddie Howard (1)
- Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg (23)
- Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann (34)
- Case 19 Marco Rusterholz (5)
- Case 20 The Cook family (1)
- Case 21 'Mr & Mrs X' (1)
- Case 22 Noel Greenaway (12)
- Case 23 Lucy Letby (2)
- Case 24 Fr Gordon MacRae (3)
- CCRC (22)
- Forensic evidence (13)
- General articles (187)
- Shaken Baby Syndrome (5)
- Uncategorized (9)
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- February 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
Meta
The Police just cannot permit this matter to proceed, the fall out will be massive! The next few weeks will be most interesting. Do not be surprised if the Governor directs the release of Sue and the “charge is withdrawn” thereby avoiding the appeal hearing and exposure of evidence. Clearly at the appeal if it proceeds which I doubt, Voss will be forced to answer the defence, the Crown cannot permit this to occur.
Agree.
But Anthony, your sentiments will not have any bearing on the case. Or legally, could they?
You, Anthony are just one of many. Like us, confounded by the “system”.
Brave Eve. Looking forward to going to the Elsternwick Cinema on Sunday to see her story at 4.30. With fellow travellers, four of us.
xxx Sue
Beyond reasonable doubt! Not on your life in Tasmania!
I’m so sorry that this happened to you Sue (and to your entire family).
I truly hope that you are released as soon as possible.
Shame on you Tasmania.
It is rightful by the Tasmanian people to no longer give credibility or even an acknowledgement to both Tasmania’s State Governor and State Attorney General.
I allege that these 2 highly respected offices of our State have overtly refused to recognize the prejudice and extreme bias held and exercised in this State’s Supreme Court, by its appointed Judiciary and its officials.
It is, albeit quite overdue, an appropriate time for the above-referred to State Legal Authority’s to come forward and answer for their reticence in recognizing the shortcomings in Tasmania’s Justice System.
The people of Tasmania are now waiting for an action by the above.
I once imagined that in a truly just and honest system where mistakes and miscarriages of justice occurred those involved would be able to say we got it wrong. Through that, despite human error, they would be applauded for their integrity and real implementation of the care and justice that every citizen deserves. The horror of an unsafe verdict and wrongful incarceration like Sue’s should outweigh any concern for reputation or career which should not be tarnished by acknowledging mistakes and setting them right. How naive I was!
This is a bad situation for the woman named Sue. Sue is a subject of extreme female violence that has been perpetrated against her. You may be interested in the PETITION that I am running – to have Human Rights International Law implemented at the domestic level – see https://chn.ge/2Hpu2aa. As a subject of International Law, I had used CEDAW at the domestic level + another treaty (Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969 – Article 27 and asked the courts to perform the treaty CEDAW and give me back my marital property from PJD. You can read the narrative on my Petition Site. The judges just did NOT obey the law! Just keep going Sue and never give up.
Why are all surprised – Corruption is the norm in Tasmania – Corruption goes to the Top of the Police and Government – the people who should be held responsible are the Police involved – Politicians – any Senior Public Servants – the Courts – but they won’t be because they are incharge of the coverups – they are the ones responsible – so an Innocent person stays in Prison. Police aren’t interested in catching a Murderer roaming the Streets – The biggest problem here is that those in charge of the Investigation have to admit they got it wrong – and they will never do that because they are the Bully Boys who never make mistakes – they have been given Awards for doing such a Good Job. They are dirty to the core.
Yes to everything already said!
Im surprised the appeal is estimated to be of a possible two weeks duration. If you have a person , whose DNA was located at the scene, and is giving evidence that her acquaintances were on board the Four Winds that same night, and they were responsible for the attacking and killing Bob Chappell, what more do you need? What on earth do they intend to discuss for ten days?
Another Christmas in jail for Sue – utterly disgraceful. Words fail me.
Unbelievable!
Never a word about the person who was on the yacht with Meagan Vass and who apparently did the crime and whose apprehension would abolish any need for any appeal.
Never a word!
One person dreading the pending SNF appeal, may be the former DPP who was also responsible for the absence of any exculpatory evidence. I believe this matter alone will be of serious consternation to all the Judiciary that were involved in the conviction of Sue Neill-Fraser, hence the laggardly and unending cavalcade of delays.
The wheels turn very slowly in Tasmania!!!! In the meantime, the Governor and Attorney General are able to make a recommendation for home detention but they do not act. WHY?????
Everyone but Sue goes home to their family each night and doesn’t give a thought for Sue while she sits in prison – it sucks!!!
Di Kemp, she, like you are a woman. And I am a man and my wife cannot believe how the system cruels her (Sue).
It should be easy to bring all of this forward for the benefit of Justice.
Her Honour set the matter down for a directions hearing to check progress for 4 pm on 12 November 2019.
Funny, if she had pleaded guilty at that time of her arrest and Bob’s disappearance, she may well be “out’ now. That is a consideration overlooked.
She, Sue, has been steadfast in her innocence.
Just goes to show how dodgy the Tasmanian government and cops are