Downside of Lyn’s Law

Posted on May 11, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban

 Convicted murderers have a choice: reveal the whereabouts of their victims’ bodies or lose access to parole. Wrongfully convicted murderers have no such choice.  Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 26 Comments

Should Lehrmann appeal? The new dispute

Posted on May 4, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban.

What’s worse than the stigma of being labelled a rapist? Being unable to wipe the label clean. Why would anyone not try, if they claimed innocence? For Lehrmann, the label is a life sentence, even though it was applied by a civil, not criminal, court. Some suggest he shouldn’t appeal. They’re wrong. Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 15 Comments

The Lehrmann verdict – your say 2

Posted on May 3, 2024 by andrew

The following are some of the comments / excerpts in response to Andrew L. Urban’s article in The Spectator Australia on May 1, 2024, ‘Was Lehrmann’s presumption of innocence left in the lions’ den?’ Reader comments were taken down and disabled on May 2, 2024. There were no comments supporting Justice Lee’s finding that on the balance of probabilities Bruce Lehrmann raped Brittany Higgins – and therefore he was not defamed by Network Ten and Lisa Wilkinson.  Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 7 Comments

Judges deciding badly: Mossop J sends 93 year old to jail

Posted on April 30, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban.

 Justice David Mossop of the ACT Supreme Court is the latest judge in Australia to make a bad decision in a criminal trial, by sentencing a 93 year old husband to nine years in prison for the mercy killing of Jean, his 92 year old wife, suffering from dementia.  Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 26 Comments

The Lehrmann verdict – your say

Posted on April 27, 2024 by andrew

Judging by published comments, the public largely rejects Justice Lee’s judgement that on the balance of probabilities Bruce Lehrmann raped Brittany Higgins on Senator Reynolds’ Ministerial couch. We publish a selection to demonstrate.  Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 14 Comments

Was Lehrmann’s presumption of innocence left in ‘lions’ den’?

Posted on April 26, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban.

It was over dinner that a former senior Australian Federal Police investigator brought it up. A question no-one appears to have considered. Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 4 Comments

NY court overturns Weinstein conviction, slams tendency evidence

Posted on April 26, 2024 by andrew

New York’s highest court on Thursday overturned disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein’s 2020 conviction on sex crime charges, a shock reversal in the landmark case that launched the #MeToo movement.  Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | Leave a comment

NACC ‘no comment’ response re inquiry into Higgins payout probe

Posted on April 19, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban.

It is open to infer that the National Anti Corruption Commission (NACC) is preparing to investigate the controversial and secretive Brittany Higgins payout of $2.44m, partly based on its bland response to our request yesterday for information. Senator Linda Reynolds referred the matter to the NACC in December 2023.  Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 16 Comments

Dear NACC, tell us about the $2.44m Higgins payout probe

Posted on April 18, 2024 by andrew

In this open letter to the NACC, ANDREW L. URBAN, explains why the NACC must publish the terms of its investigation into the hurried and secretive payout of $2.44 million to Brittany Higgins, based on what are now revealed to be false claims.  Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 7 Comments

The Lehrmann/Higgins “omnishambles” and the omniquestions

Posted on April 16, 2024 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban.

Justice Lee called the Lehrmann/Higgins drama an omnishambles, finding that Lehrmann effectively raped Higgins by not getting consent while she lay in a drunken stupor. It is “an outcome that must be respected but one that is necessarily diminished by circumstance,” as the Editorial in The Australian put it, (16/4/24).  Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 7 Comments