Author Archives: andrew

Folbigg review starts – and extends into 2023

Posted on November 13, 2022 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. The much delayed second inquiry into the Kathleen Folbigg murder conviction begins this Monday, November 14, 2022. But in a disgraceful disregard for delivering justice in a timely manner, the inquiry won’t hear crucial evidence regarding the … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg | 11 Comments

Review of illegal surveillance possibly illegal, too

Posted on November 11, 2022 by andrew

A media release by the Independent member for Nelson, Tasmania, reveals the O’Farrell Review into the illegal prison surveillance of Jeff Thompson would possibly be illegal itself. The following is a media release issued yesterday by Nelson Independent, Meg Webb, … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 9 Comments

Kathleen Folbigg conviction next under microscope – others on the way

Posted on October 31, 2022 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban The high profile case of Kathleen Folbigg’s 2003 conviction for the murder of her very young children will be under the microscope again in a second inquiry starting November 14, 2022 (listed for two weeks), with former … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, Case 05 Derek Bromley, Case 11 Robert Xie, Case 13 Robert Farquharson, Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg | 15 Comments

Sue Neill-Fraser out on parole

Posted on October 4, 2022 by andrew

Sue Neill-Fraser was released on parole this morning and driven to the parole office in Hobart by her two daughters, Sarah Bowles and Emma Fraser-Meeker, reported the ABC. 

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 67 Comments

The truth will set you free … from totalitarianism – Tasmania please note

Posted on October 3, 2022 by andrew

“When a society loses the desire to know the truth, that is a precursor to totalitarianism,” observed author, Holocaust survivor and political philosopher Hanna Arendt (1906 – 1975). Tasmanian society is now seeing that observation come closer to realisation around … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 17 Comments

Danocracy in Victoria – on the record in Battleground Melbourne

Posted on October 3, 2022 by andrew

Victorian Premier Dan Andrews truncated democracy with his repressive (mis)management of the Covid response. It’s hard to believe what was done to people protesting Covid-driven restrictions of their freedoms – but seeing Battleground Melbourne is believing. It’s a reminder and … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 4 Comments

Clayton’s review into police prison surveillance

Posted on September 30, 2022 by andrew

The terms of reference for an inquiry into the unlawful use of surveillance devices in Risdon Prison downplay any wrongdoing by Tasmania Police involved in the operation, reports David Killick in the Hobart Mercury today (Sept. 30, 2022). 

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 18 Comments

Sue Is Innocent – new YouTube channel

Posted on September 21, 2022 by andrew

A small group of activists in Hobart, with a small investment and a big target – Tasmania’s legal establishment – has launched ‘Sue Is Innocent’, a YouTube channel that intends to give an audio-visual voice to the concerns of Sue … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | 35 Comments

Parole for Sue Neill-Fraser doesn’t correct the miscarriage of justice

Posted on September 18, 2022 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban.  She’s on parole. But Sue Neill-Fraser’s 2010 conviction for the 2009 murder of her partner Bob Chappell remains undisturbed – and controversially unjust. Her two appeals were dismissed; her two High Court applications seeking leave to appeal … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 32 Comments

Sue Neill-Fraser paroled

Posted on September 16, 2022 by andrew

It’s been a bitter-sweet day for wrongful convictions today (16/9/22) with Derek Bromley’s leave to appeal his 38 year old murder conviction referred to the full Court (as we reported earlier) and Sue Neill-Fraser granted parole after 13 years in … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 40 Comments