Author Archives: andrew

Tendency evidence risks unfair trials, eg Frank Valentine

Andrew L. Urban Arguably the most insidious area of the criminal law in Australia is the application of Tendency & Coincidence evidence, a constant threat to fair trial protections. 

Posted in Case 26 Frank Valentine | Leave a comment

Note to detective: tunnel vision is unwarranted certainty

Andrew L. Urban The trouble with certainty without good evidence in crime investigation is that it easily leads to a wrongful conviction. We have reported on several cases to show this. One former detective has now claimed his ‘certainty’ should … Continue reading

Posted in Case 22 Noel Greenaway, Case 26 Frank Valentine | 3 Comments

Reforms to make convictions safe(er)

Andrew L. Urban Too many unsafe convictions have put innocents behind bars. Our deformed criminal justice system must be reformed. Following on from our most recent posts examining various ongoing flaws and weaknesses in Australia’s criminal justice system (see * … Continue reading

Posted in Case 02 Henry Keogh, Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg, General articles | 5 Comments

To correct atrocities of the law relieve politicians of the burden

Andrew L. Urban Advocating for a review of what is arguably a wrongful murder conviction doesn’t make you soft on murder. Likewise, advocating for a review of what is arguably a wrongful sexual assault conviction doesn’t mean you support sexual … Continue reading

Posted in Case 06 'Paul' | 7 Comments

Prosecutors hunting for convictions

Andrew L. Urban Prosecutorial (bad) behaviour is partly responsible for nearly 1 in 5 wrongful convictions in Australia. That is the statistic reported in a Griffith University study. That study looked at just 71 wrongful convictions. Behind the statistic is … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, Case 11 Robert Xie, Case 19 Marco Rusterholz | 3 Comments

Bad law & judges with poor judgement

Andrew L. Urban  A combination of bad law and poor judicial decisions results in wrongful convictions. Frank Valentine was found guilty by the judge at his trial. The judge’s decision and reasons raised over 500 points of objection at appeal … Continue reading

Posted in Case 26 Frank Valentine | 5 Comments

A Tottle eclipse of the lie; Sharaz to pay $242,471+

Andrew L. Urban West Australian Supreme Court judge Paul Tottle completed his demolition of the lie that Linda Reynolds was callous and part of a political cover up of Brittany Higgins’ rape claim against Bruce Lehrmann, with damages totalling $242,471 … Continue reading

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 4 Comments

Justice system indifferent to injustice?

Citing several wrongful convictions examined on wrongfulconvictionsreport.org in his forthcoming book, Frank Valentine and the Abuse of Lady Justice – Presumption of Evil 2, author Andrew L. Urban condemns the justice system’s seeming indifference to injustice. 

Posted in General articles | 11 Comments

Give us back our money, Brittany, taxpayers may well demand

Andrew L. Urban  Was the Commonwealth negligent to pay Brittany Higgins $2.4 m in response to her claims that have now been found to be false by two judges, and will the commonwealth take steps to recoup the taxpayers’ money, … Continue reading

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 6 Comments

Brittany Higgins defamed Linda Reynolds with malice

In this week’s devastating findings by Justice Paul Tottle of the Supreme Court of Western Australia, the judge found that Brittany Higgins had exaggerated and embellished aspects of her story when speaking to the media, critical elements of her narrative did not correspond with … Continue reading

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 9 Comments