Author Archives: andrew

The Crown’s resources $$$$$ v the accused $ – unequal arms

Andrew L. Urban By the time Robert Xie faced his fourth trial in June 2016 for the murder of the Lin family, he was physically, mentally – and financially – exhausted. Convicted, the appeal was still to come … he … Continue reading

Posted in Case 04 Gordon Wood, Case 11 Robert Xie | 2 Comments

Presumption of innocence OUT, guilt by say-so IN

Andrew L. Urban All Australian jurisdictions have abolished the mandatory requirement for corroboration of claims in sexual crime prosecutions. This means no jurisdiction requires independent evidence to support a complainant’s testimony for a conviction. This has negated the presumption of … Continue reading

Posted in Case 06 'Paul', Case 22 Noel Greenaway, Case 26 Frank Valentine | Leave a comment

No valid reasons to dismiss calls for an independent review of the Sue Neill-Fraser case

Andrew L. Urban  Given the failures of two previous appeals by Sue Neill-Fraser against her discredited murder conviction, Tasmania’s legal system is still defying serious scrutiny. The latest Etter/Selby report highlights both the reasons and the need. Former Tasmanian Attorney … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 4 Comments

Hobart Mercury readers again voice their concern at Sue Neill-Fraser conviction

It’s been 15 years since Sue Neill-Fraser’s now discredited trial, but spurred on by the latest Etter/Selby report tabled in Parliament which sets out new material challenging the conviction, Tasmanians are calling for an inquiry– again.

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 4 Comments

Bring on the Valkyries to recover Sue Neill-Fraser

Andrew L. Urban  There seem to be two schools of thought on how to try and overturn Sue Neill-Fraser’s murder conviction by those who believe, as we do, that it is plainly wrongful. One school holds that the best way … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 3 Comments

Failure to investigate and properly disclose information – why?

Andrew L. Urban  In the latest explosive Etter/Selby report tabled in the Tasmanian Parliament this week digging into the police investigation of the Sue Neill-Fraser conviction, the authors ask: Why did that failure to investigate and properly disclose information happen? … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | Leave a comment

DNA red herring bites prosecutor – new report

If you see furious senior Tasmanian police lurching red faced out of their HQ, they are probably clutching a 78-page report that just landed which sets out why an independent inquiry into the conviction of Sue Neill-Fraser can no longer … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 20 Comments

The “ethical reset needed” for prosecutors

Andrew L. Urban Prosecutors in the room described the speech as “the ethical reset we all needed”. They refer to Wayne Martin AC KC’s keynote speech “The Prosecutor’s Duty and the Prosecutor’s Conscience at the Australian Association of Crown Prosecutors … Continue reading

Posted in Case 04 Gordon Wood | 10 Comments

Jesse Harvey and the curse of SBS

Just as we were publishing a thorough debunking of the junk science behind Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) in 2019, a 21 year old father in Victoria, Jesse Harvey, was sentenced to six years jail for injuring his baby son by … Continue reading

Posted in Shaken Baby Syndrome | 6 Comments

Who can we turn to if the law turns away?

WA Shadow Attorney General The Hon Nick Goiran MLC As if to illustrate how unaccountable our legal practitioners are across Australia (in the wake our recent articles), WA’s Shadow Attorney General The Hon Nick Goiran MLC, has just replied to … Continue reading

Posted in General articles | Leave a comment