Author Archives: andrew

Selby v Ellis continued – how jury was misled in Sue Neill-Fraser murder trial

Posted on March 19, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban  Yesterday, we published a letter from former Tasmanian DPP Tim Ellis SC in which he accused former barrister Hugh Selby of a failure of integrity in Selby’s article. Today, Selby replies, to emphasise how the jury was … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 5 Comments

Former Sue Neill-Fraser prosecutor Tim Ellis SC takes issue with former barrister Hugh Selby’s latest article

Posted on March 18, 2026 by andrew

Former Tasmanian DPP Tim Ellis SC was the prosecutor in the now infamous 2010 Sue Neill-Fraser murder trial. In a letter to wrongfulconvictionsreport.org, he accuses Hugh Selby’s March 16, 2026 article of “sadly lacking in the integrity he constantly accuses … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 25 Comments

Non-disclosures in Sue Neill-Fraser case mean no valid conviction

Posted on March 16, 2026 by andrew

In what can be seen as a companion piece to our article, Duty of disclosure lasts forever by Bibi Sangha and Dr Bob Moles, former barrister HUGH SELBY explains why the police and prosecutors are required to disclose to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 10 Comments

When directors of public prosecutions aren’t accountable

Posted on March 9, 2026 by andrew

“There is no good reason in 2026 to allow directors of public prosecutions to be less accountable than anyone else for their conduct and their decisions. The present ‘non-accountability’ brings our criminal justice system into disrepute” writes former barrister HUGH SELBY in … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, General articles | Leave a comment

Forensic science services in crisis – loyalty to courts or police?

Posted on February 28, 2026 by andrew

Forensic science services, at the heart of many trials, are under the microscope like never before. Last month, the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee published a report concerned about lack of labs’ independence from police. On March 4, … Continue reading →

Posted in Forensic evidence | 7 Comments

“You’ve got the wrong Shorty!”

Posted on February 27, 2026 by andrew

The case of Stephen “Shorty” Jamieson and insights into the legal misconceptions that cause transcript injustice in forensic contexts. How the flaws live on, despite the reforms of the 1990s, writes HELEN FRASER, Director of the Research Hub for Language … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 28 Stephen Shorty Jamieson, Forensic evidence | Leave a comment

Briefings for Tasmanian MPs on debate re Sue Neill-Fraser inquiry  

Posted on February 25, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban Members of Tasmania’s Legislative Council will soon debate a motion to support an independent inquiry into and report on the safety or otherwise of Sue Neill-Fraser’s 2010 murder conviction. Drawing on years of chronicling the history of … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 3 Comments

FREE symposium on the wrongful rape & murder conviction of Stephen ‘Shorty’ Jamieson

Posted on February 22, 2026 by andrew

Stephen ‘Shorty’ Jamieson was a homeless 22-year-old when – on the basis of his nickname – he was charged with the brutal 1988 abduction, rape, and murder of Janine Balding. Two years later, he was sentenced to life in prison, … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 5 Comments

Can Australian justice system learn from major UK report?

Posted on February 20, 2026 by andrew

In its landmark report just released under the title, “Rebuilding forensic science for criminal justice: an urgent need” the House of Lords’ Science and Technology Committee has completed its thorough investigation into the most consequential aspect of the criminal justice … Continue reading →

Posted in Forensic evidence | Leave a comment

Shamed Scottish Judges exposed for unfair application of rape shield laws

Posted on February 19, 2026 by andrew

Too often men simply aren’t allowed to provide juries with relevant evidence critical to their defence, writes BETTINA ARNDT. And not only in Scotland … in Australia too.

Posted in General articles | 6 Comments