Author Archives: andrew

Lindsay Clancy tragedy: who are really responsible? A damning exposé

Posted on September 13, 2026 by andrew

Why is Lindsay Clancy the only person facing criminal prosecution for the heartbreaking tragedy of her children’s deaths? Institutional cover up? Here’s what all those outraged by Lindsay Clancy as a monster mother need to know, before passing judgement on … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 32 Lindsay Clancy | Leave a comment

Tendency evidence lacked probative value, had prejudicial effect 

Posted on September 11, 2026 by andrew

Former Canberra academic Rick McGary was last year found guilty of two counts of sexual assault over incidents against separate complainants in 2016 and 2020, but acquitted of a third count. The Court of Appeal has now set aside the … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 3 Comments

When the machine says you’re guilty: Australia’s coming danger from AI

Posted on September 11, 2026 by andrew

Will the AI machinery just drive faster towards wrong conclusions or can Australia avoid replacing human fallibility with digital damnation, asks STEVEN FENNELL. Today, for now, a wrongful conviction requires humans to make mistakes. That is, admittedly, inefficient. A police … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 2 Comments

Can reasonable doubt overcome public abhorrence at child killings? Exploring the Clancy case.

Posted on September 10, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. The history of mothers killing their children facing murder charges is turbulent terrain. The cases of Lindy Chamberlain, Kathleen Folbigg in Australia, Lucy Letby (a nurse) in the UK and most recently Lindsay Clancy in the US … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 32 Lindsay Clancy | 2 Comments

Week 37, 2026, on our sister blog pursuedemocracy.com

Posted on September 10, 2026 by andrew

Read posts on the Bell Royal Commission, burning the Aussie flag and Labor’s planned Alborithms. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Call for NSW inquiry into wrongful conviction of wrong Shorty

Posted on September 9, 2026 by andrew

Stephen “Shorty” Jamieson is 38 years into a life sentence arising from an alleged confession documented only by an uncorroborated “verbatim record of interview” typed by detectives who arrested him in 1988, as we reported earlier this year.

Posted in Case 28 Stephen Shorty Jamieson | 2 Comments

Who speaks for the person being investigated, e.g. Bruce Lehrmann …

Posted on September 7, 2026 by andrew

Prompted by our report ‘ ‘Unlawful’: Lehrmann slams secret corruption hearings, STEVEN FENNELL, who was acquitted of murder by the High Court, digs into the dangers of preventing an investigated person from speaking publicly.  

Posted in General articles | Leave a comment

Lindsay Clancy: was she insane or is she evil?

Posted on September 6, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. Mother strangles her three kiddies. Why? Shocking, but was it murder? Far from straightforward, the complex Clancy case is left in limbo as one juror repeatedly dissents, triggering a retrial. 

Posted in Case 32 Lindsay Clancy | 1 Comment

‘Unlawful’: Lehrmann slams secret corruption hearings

Posted on September 5, 2026 by andrew

Bruce Lehrmann wants to air further allegations of mistreatment by the anti-corruption watchdog including that he was forced to give evidence during secret hearings and then gagged from discussing it, reports Miklos Bolza in CBR News. Bolza reports that officials … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | Leave a comment

Sue Neill-Fraser challenge to Parole Board free speech restriction rescheduled

Posted on September 5, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. “Parole should be a pathway to reintegration, not a way of continuing to impose punishment. When parole conditions silence people or limit their freedom of expression, they violate basic human rights and increase the risk of re-incarceration,” … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | Leave a comment