-
Sign Up
Categories
- Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser (263)
- Case 02 Henry Keogh (15)
- Case 03 David Szach (4)
- Case 04 Gordon Wood (12)
- Case 05 Derek Bromley (31)
- Case 06 'Paul' (13)
- Case 07 George Pell (10)
- Case 08 Sarah May Ward (1)
- Case 09 Joby Rowe (1)
- Case 10 Steven Fennell (2)
- Case 11 Robert Xie (46)
- Case 12 Bradley Murdoch (2)
- Case 13 Robert Farquharson (10)
- Case 14 Scott Austic (2)
- Case 15 John Fleming (1)
- Case 16 Eddie Howard (1)
- Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg (27)
- Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann (43)
- Case 19 Marco Rusterholz (7)
- Case 20 The Cook family (1)
- Case 21 'Mr & Mrs X' (1)
- Case 22 Noel Greenaway (20)
- Case 23 Lucy Letby (3)
- Case 24 Fr Gordon MacRae (4)
- Case 25 Cedric and Noelene Jordan (1)
- Case 26 Frank Valentine (11)
- CCRC (24)
- Forensic evidence (13)
- General articles (197)
- Shaken Baby Syndrome (6)
- Uncategorized (13)
-
Recent Posts
- The Crown’s resources $$$$$ v the accused $ – unequal arms
- Presumption of innocence OUT, guilt by say-so IN
- No valid reasons to dismiss calls for an independent review of the Sue Neill-Fraser case
- Hobart Mercury readers again voice their concern at Sue Neill-Fraser conviction
- Bring on the Valkyries to recover Sue Neill-Fraser
Recent Comments
- Rachael M on The Crown’s resources $$$$$ v the accused $ – unequal arms
- LizP on The Crown’s resources $$$$$ v the accused $ – unequal arms
- Linda on No valid reasons to dismiss calls for an independent review of the Sue Neill-Fraser case
- g.churchill on No valid reasons to dismiss calls for an independent review of the Sue Neill-Fraser case
- Steven Fennell on No valid reasons to dismiss calls for an independent review of the Sue Neill-Fraser case
Archives
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- February 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
Meta
Author Archives: andrew
The Crown’s resources $$$$$ v the accused $ – unequal arms
Andrew L. Urban By the time Robert Xie faced his fourth trial in June 2016 for the murder of the Lin family, he was physically, mentally – and financially – exhausted. Convicted, the appeal was still to come … he … Continue reading
Posted in Case 04 Gordon Wood, Case 11 Robert Xie
2 Comments
Presumption of innocence OUT, guilt by say-so IN
Andrew L. Urban All Australian jurisdictions have abolished the mandatory requirement for corroboration of claims in sexual crime prosecutions. This means no jurisdiction requires independent evidence to support a complainant’s testimony for a conviction. This has negated the presumption of … Continue reading
No valid reasons to dismiss calls for an independent review of the Sue Neill-Fraser case
Andrew L. Urban Given the failures of two previous appeals by Sue Neill-Fraser against her discredited murder conviction, Tasmania’s legal system is still defying serious scrutiny. The latest Etter/Selby report highlights both the reasons and the need. Former Tasmanian Attorney … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
4 Comments
Hobart Mercury readers again voice their concern at Sue Neill-Fraser conviction
It’s been 15 years since Sue Neill-Fraser’s now discredited trial, but spurred on by the latest Etter/Selby report tabled in Parliament which sets out new material challenging the conviction, Tasmanians are calling for an inquiry– again.
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
4 Comments
Bring on the Valkyries to recover Sue Neill-Fraser
Andrew L. Urban There seem to be two schools of thought on how to try and overturn Sue Neill-Fraser’s murder conviction by those who believe, as we do, that it is plainly wrongful. One school holds that the best way … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
3 Comments
Failure to investigate and properly disclose information – why?
Andrew L. Urban In the latest explosive Etter/Selby report tabled in the Tasmanian Parliament this week digging into the police investigation of the Sue Neill-Fraser conviction, the authors ask: Why did that failure to investigate and properly disclose information happen? … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
Leave a comment
DNA red herring bites prosecutor – new report
If you see furious senior Tasmanian police lurching red faced out of their HQ, they are probably clutching a 78-page report that just landed which sets out why an independent inquiry into the conviction of Sue Neill-Fraser can no longer … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser
20 Comments
The “ethical reset needed” for prosecutors
Andrew L. Urban Prosecutors in the room described the speech as “the ethical reset we all needed”. They refer to Wayne Martin AC KC’s keynote speech “The Prosecutor’s Duty and the Prosecutor’s Conscience at the Australian Association of Crown Prosecutors … Continue reading
Posted in Case 04 Gordon Wood
10 Comments
Jesse Harvey and the curse of SBS
Just as we were publishing a thorough debunking of the junk science behind Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) in 2019, a 21 year old father in Victoria, Jesse Harvey, was sentenced to six years jail for injuring his baby son by … Continue reading
Posted in Shaken Baby Syndrome
6 Comments
Who can we turn to if the law turns away?
WA Shadow Attorney General The Hon Nick Goiran MLC As if to illustrate how unaccountable our legal practitioners are across Australia (in the wake our recent articles), WA’s Shadow Attorney General The Hon Nick Goiran MLC, has just replied to … Continue reading
Posted in General articles
Leave a comment