Author Archives: andrew

Men make false sex assault claims, too

Posted on January 29, 2026 by andrew

Reader Dieter Fischer posted a comment (on January 28, 2026) that prompted the research that underpins this post. He made the point that it is not only females that make false claims of sexual assault; men do too. 

Posted in General articles | Leave a comment

A supreme mis-judgement?

Posted on January 28, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban  Phillip Boulten, a criminal barrister elevated to the NSW Supreme Court despite a history of criticism of Zionists and police, will primarily handle common law and murder cases, NSW Attorney-General Michael Daley says, in an effort to … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | Leave a comment

Safety in perjury for fake sex assault claims – why?

Posted on January 25, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban  Even some judges have called for reforms to laws shielding sex abuse claimants (see below) – why has the legal system done nothing about it? 

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Sue Neill-Fraser petition on its way to Tasmanian Governor and Premier

Posted on January 23, 2026 by andrew

With nearly 40,000 verifiable signatures, the petition calling for a judicial inquiry into the contested conviction of Sue Neill-Fraser for the murder of her partner Bob Chappell will be handed Tasmania’s MLC The Hon Meg Webb at the January 24, … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 2 Comments

Tasmanian Parole Board’s condition on Sue Neill-Fraser unlawful

Posted on January 22, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban  The Tasmanian Parole Board last year acted contrary to the High Court’s rulings when it tightened the parole condition on Sue Neill-Fraser, prohibiting her from claiming her innocence of the 2009 murder of Bob Chappel, her former … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 4 Comments

Justice Estcourt stands with Sue Neill-Fraser

Posted on January 21, 2026 by andrew

It was no doubt a shock to Tasmania’s legal establishment when one of its most senior judges delivered a dissenting opinion – not because of his dissent per se, but because he argued to uphold the appeal against the most … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, Case 19 Marco Rusterholz | 5 Comments

How Daniel Andrews wanted to shift blame in Bike Boy scandal – new podcast

Posted on January 20, 2026 by andrew

Earlier this month, Bike Boy, a 6-epsiode podcast was launched that details how former Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews and his wife Catherine caused the car-and-bike crash that almost killed then 15 year old Ryan Mueleman and then scrambled to cover … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 2 Comments

Liar – #MeToo

Posted on January 17, 2026 by andrew

In 2020 artist Anthony Lister’s home was raided by a 23-man task force – including police armed with sub machine guns – who had come to arrest him for sexual assault. They broke down his door before carting him off … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 5 Comments

Barrister, politician, filmmaker, artist to speak at Sue Neill-Fraser Hobart rally Jan. 24

Posted on January 14, 2026 by andrew

A rally in Hobart Parliament Gardens remembering Bob Chappel and showing support for Sue Neill-Fraser on Saturday, January 24, 2026 will mark the 17th anniversary of Chappell’s disappearance (January 26, 2009). Chappel’s body has never been found; Neill-Fraser was controversially … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 6 Comments

Roadkill of the legal system

Posted on January 11, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban If a bus carelessly runs over a pedestrian, we rightly expect the driver to call an ambulance – and he or she does so. We also demand that the driver be punished and better trained. The criminal … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments