Author Archives: andrew

Starting AI at the crime scene on path to safer convictions

Posted on October 29, 2026 by andrew

STEVEN FENNELL writes in response to Adrian Bertino-Clarke’s article, “What If Reviewing a Possible Wrongful Conviction Cost Almost Nothing?” published yesterday, expanding on the potential for AI to help reduce the incidence of wrongful convictions. I have no formal qualifications … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | Leave a comment

What If Reviewing a Possible Wrongful Conviction Cost Almost Nothing?

Posted on October 28, 2026 by andrew

ADRIAN BERTINO-CLARKE asks what happens to the justice system when artificial intelligence makes it dramatically cheaper to question whether an old conviction is safe. 

Posted in General articles | Leave a comment

How pre-trial AI ‘fairness review’ could minimise wrongful convictions

Posted on October 27, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban.  Prosecutors should not always need an AI agent to identify weaknesses in a circumstantial case. For instance, you don’t need to have been a trainee lawyer to have recognised that the police brief of the Sue Neill-Fraser … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, General articles | 6 Comments

The Ben Roberts-Smith matter – of heroes, the fog of asymmetric conflict and the fog of memory

Posted on October 26, 2026 by andrew

In response to our report about a war zone that pits soldiers against fake civilians as insurgents, Insurgents 24/7, STEVEN FENNELL teases out why the many tangible and intangible costs of ignoring the operational reality of asymmetric conflict are so … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 31 Ben Roberts-Smith | 1 Comment

Insurgents 24/7

Posted on October 25, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. In the matter of Ben Roberts-Smith … a historic reminder. News photos illustrating reports of unarmed pre-teen and teenage schoolchildren clambering out of sight onto Soviet tanks in Budapest in October 1956 went around the world – … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 31 Ben Roberts-Smith | Leave a comment

Andrew L. Urban interviews GPT-6

Posted on October 23, 2026 by andrew

ANDREW URBAN: I am a journalist, my name is Andrew Urban. I’d like to interview you. Do you consent? CHATGPT: Yes, Andrew Urban. I consent to being interviewed. I’m happy to answer your questions on the record, including challenging questions about artificial … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 9 Comments

From the archives: woman on fire, husband accused – tragedy in Rouse Hill

Posted on October 20, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. Parwinder Kaur had poured a small amount of petrol onto herself, hardly enough to fill a teacup. A few minutes later she flicked on a cigarette lighter and ignited the petrol. It was intended not to kill … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 2 Comments

Sue Neill-Fraser’s 16 years in 60 Minutes

Posted on October 19, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. Almost exactly 16 years ago (15 Oct. 2010), the murder trial of Sue Neill-Fraser came to an end with the jury satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that she had killed her partner of 18 years, Bob Chappell. But … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 20 Comments

Sue Neill-Fraser’s trial judge cross examined

Posted on October 17, 2026 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban. On the eve of tomorrow’s 60 Minutes (Nine Network) special report on the case of Sue Neill-Fraser, we take you back to her trial in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, for the murder of her partner Bob … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 4 Comments

Sue Neill-Fraser on 60 Minutes, October 18, 2026

Posted on October 15, 2026 by andrew

  One of Australia’s most serious miscarriages of justice is the murder conviction of Sue Neill-Fraser in 2010. Tasmania’s legal system, aided by its political establishment, refuses to contemplate an independent review of the case. Viewers may find that outrageous. … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 7 Comments