Author Archives: andrew

Lehrmann’s hell in legal purgatory

Posted on December 4, 2025 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban  Now that Bruce Lehrmann’s appeal against the negative result in his defamation case against TEN and Lisa Wilkinson has been dismissed in the Federal Court, the legal quagmire has deepened. He is living in the hell of … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 2 Comments

Tasmanian Legislative Council urged on “a wide-ranging powerful commission of inquiry” into Sue Neill-Fraser case

Posted on December 3, 2025 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban You won’t be surprised that the Tasmanian Government is continuing to stonewall on the calls for an inquiry into the Sue Neill-Fraser case, firmly keeping a blind eye on the mountain of reasons in favour of one. … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 5 Comments

Is Sue Neill-Fraser’s murder conviction built on fraud? LIA says yes.

Posted on December 2, 2025 by andrew

LIA, the new Legal Intel AI, has identified at least four issues as potential grounds that might be framed as a ‘fraud on the court’ in the case of Sue Neill-Fraser. One would be enough. Given the shameful history of … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 4 Comments

Is Marco Rusterholz really the murderer? A private investigation

Posted on November 27, 2025 by andrew

JAKE HOLLAND  A friend of Marco’s asked me to look at the case a couple of years ago but I originally shrugged it off as a typical “I didn’t do it story” and then some time later in a moment … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 19 Marco Rusterholz | 2 Comments

Misplaced morality in our criminal justice system

Posted on November 26, 2025 by andrew

One could argue that juries these days are more likely to be sympathetic to the ruling orthodoxies; hence the George Pell and Noel Greenaway* convictions, to cite two examples. It’s no surprise, since juries are chosen from the general population, … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 07 George Pell, Case 22 Noel Greenaway, Case 26 Frank Valentine | 1 Comment

New AI tool shames legal system

Posted on November 25, 2025 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban He was accused, charged, tried, convicted and sentenced; his appeal was dismissed. His Petition for Mercy to the Governor was put aside by the A-G as was his claim of innocence. His otherwise exemplary life, his family … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | 2 Comments

Higgins can of worms still can of worms

Posted on November 24, 2025 by andrew

This is an unedited copy of a comment posted on the story “As Higgins lied about the cover up…” by reader Anne, on 23 November, 2025, for the benefit of readers. 

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 1 Comment

As Higgins lied about the cover up …

Posted on November 21, 2025 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban Two judges, Justice Lee and Justice Tottle, have found Brittany Higgins lied about a political cover up of her alleged rape in then Minister Linda Reynolds’ Parliament House office. Yet Justice Lee accepted her word over Bruce … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 10 Comments

The Crown’s resources $$$$$ v the accused $ – unequal arms

Posted on November 19, 2025 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban By the time Robert Xie faced his fourth trial in June 2016 for the murder of the Lin family, he was physically, mentally – and financially – exhausted. Convicted, the appeal was still to come … he … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 04 Gordon Wood, Case 11 Robert Xie | 3 Comments

Presumption of innocence OUT, guilt by say-so IN

Posted on November 19, 2025 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban All Australian jurisdictions have abolished the mandatory requirement for corroboration of claims in sexual crime prosecutions. This means no jurisdiction requires independent evidence to support a complainant’s testimony for a conviction. This has negated the presumption of … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 06 'Paul', Case 22 Noel Greenaway, Case 26 Frank Valentine | Leave a comment