Monthly Archives: December 2025

When Murphy’s law was right

The late jurist Lionel Murphy (1922 – 1986) wrote a prescient dissenting view when the High Court rejected Lindy Chamberlain’s 1984 appeal, where Murphy was outvoted 3-2. It is essential reading even now. Murphy’s summary turned out to be 100% … Continue reading

Posted in Lindy Chamberlain | 6 Comments

Coming soon: true crime movies inspired by real events

Andrew L. Urban  Another title could be “You can’t make this stuff up!” And we didn’t. Or you could file it under ‘Truth is stranger than fiction’. We have been inspired by real events to draft these story lines. Sadly, … Continue reading

Posted in General articles | 4 Comments

A-G Rowland says ‘no’ to CCRC – much needed law reform

Not for the first time, a Federal Attorney-General has shrugged off a proposal to consider the establishment of a Criminal Cases Review Commission. The public should know this. The legal profession should know this – especially the few who have … Continue reading

Posted in CCRC | 2 Comments

Juries and the GIGO principle

Andrew L. Urban In a Sydney murder trial, Juror John was so disturbed by what he saw as the Crown’s unethical behaviour, unrestrained by the judge, he barely could restrain himself from jumping out of his seat and shouting his … Continue reading

Posted in General articles | 6 Comments

Lehrmann’s hell in legal purgatory

Andrew L. Urban  Now that Bruce Lehrmann’s appeal against the negative result in his defamation case against TEN and Lisa Wilkinson has been dismissed in the Federal Court, the legal quagmire has deepened. He is living in the hell of … Continue reading

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 6 Comments

Tasmanian Legislative Council urged on “a wide-ranging powerful commission of inquiry” into Sue Neill-Fraser case

Andrew L. Urban You won’t be surprised that the Tasmanian Government is continuing to stonewall on the calls for an inquiry into the Sue Neill-Fraser case, firmly keeping a blind eye on the mountain of reasons in favour of one. … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 13 Comments

Is Sue Neill-Fraser’s murder conviction built on fraud? LIA says yes.

LIA, the new Legal Intel AI, has identified at least four issues as potential grounds that might be framed as a ‘fraud on the court’ in the case of Sue Neill-Fraser. One would be enough. Given the shameful history of … Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 4 Comments