Greenaway’s “integrity and high personal standards” – it’s official

Andrew L. Urban

It must have been quietly heartbreaking for Rowena Greenaway to come across this document on the eve of Christmas 2025, written on 9 August 1962, attesting to her now husband Noel Greenaway’s “integrity and high personal standards”. A couple of years or so after that document was written, Noel is alleged to have committed scores of hideous crimes of sexual and physical abuse on teenagers at an institution. Rowena couldn’t show it to Noel – he is in prison serving a 20 year sentence.  Continue reading

Posted in Case 22 Noel Greenaway | Leave a comment

When is an anti-Zionist insult not an insult?

Andrew L. Urban

A Melbourne magistrate has ruled prosecutors must prove former Burgertory boss Hash Tayeh had intent to “insult or offend” when he chanted “all Zionists are terrorists” in public. Well, blow me down, Magistrate Malcolm Thomas, obviously wanted to prove the substance of my recent post about common sense (Dec 10, 2025) … So I guess I could get away with yelling “All Magistrates are fools…” as long as I claimed it wasn’t meant to be insulting? Continue reading

Posted in General articles | 5 Comments

What do Linda Reynolds and Bondi massacre have in common?

Andrew L. Urban

There is a straight line between the Albanese leadership’s response to the Bondi Beach massacre on Sunday December 14, 2025 and its behaviour towards former Senator Linda Reynolds. That straight line points to a lack of integrity. Actually, it’s not just the response to the latest massacre of Jews, it’s the history of their behaviour towards Israel since that earlier massacre of Jews on October 7, 2023. Continue reading

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 16 Comments

Australia inherited old mindsets on wrongful convictions – and kept them

Andrew L. Urban

The costumed theatre of our law courts take us back to the mindset of the 1800s when there was no such thing as a pesky appellate process. But the courts are still hanging on to a sense of infallibility – or at least a determined reluctance to correct mistakes.  Continue reading

Posted in General articles | 2 Comments

Prosecutorial misconduct triggers new trial for Greg Lynn

Andrew L. Urban

In upholding the Greg Lynn appeal, justices Karin Emerton, Phillip Priest and Peter Kidd said: “Unhappily, we have concluded that the conduct of prosecuting counsel so compromised the fairness of the applicant’s trial that a substantial miscarriage of justice resulted.”  Continue reading

Posted in General articles | 2 Comments

ACT Integrity (???) Commission dismisses Sofronoff appeal, no surprise

Andrew L. Urban

 The ACT Integrity Commission had found that Walter Sofronoff providing his report on the inquiry into the criminal prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann to two journalists (under embargo) was corrupt. He appealed and in dismissing his appeal, the Commission probably boosted his appeal, if you’ll excuse the word-play. Continue reading

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann | 5 Comments

Does it pass the pub test = does it pass the common sense test?

Andrew L. Urban

 Common sense would tell you that a migrant with imperfect English accused of murdering a whole family but claiming to be innocent would not make a confession to negate his alibi to a stranger in jail, even if he didn’t know the stranger was a police snitch? Yet even appeal judges bought the prosecution’s assertion. When gullibility – or bias – negates common sense ….  Continue reading

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, Case 07 George Pell, Case 11 Robert Xie | 5 Comments

The case of the missing gold prospector

Andrew L. Urban

The conviction of Stephen Struber and Dianne Wilson-Struber for the 2012 murder of gold prospector Bruce Schuler in remote Queensland carries a high risk of wrongful conviction when assessed against established international miscarriage-of-justice indicators. Former detective and author Graeme Crowley identifies 140 inconsistencies in the evidence. LIA questions the verdict.  Continue reading

Posted in S & D Struber, Stephen & Dianne Struber | 5 Comments

When Murphy’s law was right

The late jurist Lionel Murphy (1922 – 1986) wrote a prescient dissenting view when the High Court rejected Lindy Chamberlain’s 1984 appeal, where Murphy was outvoted 3-2. It is essential reading even now. Murphy’s summary turned out to be 100% right.  Continue reading

Posted in Lindy Chamberlain | 6 Comments

Coming soon: true crime movies inspired by real events

Andrew L. Urban 

Another title could be “You can’t make this stuff up!” And we didn’t. Or you could file it under ‘Truth is stranger than fiction’. We have been inspired by real events to draft these story lines. Sadly, there are no happy endings … yet. Continue reading

Posted in General articles | 4 Comments