Author Archives: andrew

Failure to investigate and properly disclose information – why?

Posted on November 13, 2025 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban  In the latest explosive Etter/Selby report tabled in the Tasmanian Parliament this week digging into the police investigation of the Sue Neill-Fraser conviction, the authors ask: Why did that failure to investigate and properly disclose information happen? … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | Leave a comment

DNA red herring bites prosecutor – new report

Posted on November 13, 2025 by andrew

If you see furious senior Tasmanian police lurching red faced out of their HQ, they are probably clutching a 78-page report that just landed which sets out why an independent inquiry into the conviction of Sue Neill-Fraser can no longer … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser | 20 Comments

The “ethical reset needed” for prosecutors

Posted on November 11, 2025 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban Prosecutors in the room described the speech as “the ethical reset we all needed”. They refer to Wayne Martin AC KC’s keynote speech “The Prosecutor’s Duty and the Prosecutor’s Conscience at the Australian Association of Crown Prosecutors … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 04 Gordon Wood | 10 Comments

Jesse Harvey and the curse of SBS

Posted on November 2, 2025 by andrew

Just as we were publishing a thorough debunking of the junk science behind Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) in 2019, a 21 year old father in Victoria, Jesse Harvey, was sentenced to six years jail for injuring his baby son by … Continue reading →

Posted in Shaken Baby Syndrome | 6 Comments

Who can we turn to if the law turns away?

Posted on November 1, 2025 by andrew

WA Shadow Attorney General The Hon Nick Goiran MLC As if to illustrate how unaccountable our legal practitioners are across Australia (in the wake our recent articles), WA’s Shadow Attorney General The Hon Nick Goiran MLC, has just replied to … Continue reading →

Posted in General articles | Leave a comment

Lack of real accountability weakens the justice system

Posted on October 30, 2025 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban A search for examples of how judges and prosecutors are held accountable for serious professional error or misconduct reveals that while they are accountable in theory, in reality they are not. This leniency emboldens misconduct and keeps … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann, Case 19 Marco Rusterholz | 1 Comment

So many law reformers, so little reforming

Posted on October 29, 2025 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban There are approximately 188 employees working at the 10 state and federal organisations working on law reform topics. See if you can find any of these bodies addressing wrongful convictions, wrongdoing by judges or prosecutors or propose … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 22 Noel Greenaway, Case 26 Frank Valentine, CCRC | 2 Comments

Can we legitimately call it a ‘justice’ system?

Posted on October 28, 2025 by andrew

Andrew L. Urban In just the three cases that were cited in our recent series (Oct 20 – 26 2025) allocating seven of our Red Herring Certificates to a total of 8 judges and 3 prosecutors who we believe have … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, Case 11 Robert Xie, Case 26 Frank Valentine, CCRC | 5 Comments

The seventh Red Herring Certificate goes jointly to Basten AJA, Button J and Wilson J of the NSW Court of Appeal

Posted on October 26, 2025 by andrew

In a dispiriting 3:0 decision, Frank Valentine’s multi-point appeal against his many convictions by Judge Noman was dismissed as if there was not a single valid ground. Not even when evidence contradicts the conviction. 

Posted in Case 26 Frank Valentine | 1 Comment

The sixth Red Herring Certificate goes to … Judge Nicole Noman SC

Posted on October 25, 2025 by andrew

So much is wrong with Nicole Noman’s judgement in the 2017 historical sexual abuse accusations trial of Frank Valentine, (the appeal document listed over 500 points) I present only a representative few that stand out as worthy of this Certificate. … Continue reading →

Posted in Case 26 Frank Valentine | 1 Comment