-
Sign Up
Categories
- Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser (245)
- Case 02 Henry Keogh (11)
- Case 03 David Szach (3)
- Case 04 Gordon Wood (7)
- Case 05 Derek Bromley (26)
- Case 06 'Paul' (9)
- Case 07 George Pell (10)
- Case 08 Sarah May Ward (1)
- Case 09 Joby Rowe (1)
- Case 10 Steven Fennell (1)
- Case 11 Robert Xie (25)
- Case 12 Bradley Murdoch (2)
- Case 13 Robert Farquharson (8)
- Case 14 Scott Austic (2)
- Case 15 John Fleming (1)
- Case 16 Eddie Howard (1)
- Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg (23)
- Case 18 Bruce Lehrmann (34)
- Case 19 Marco Rusterholz (5)
- Case 20 The Cook family (1)
- Case 21 'Mr & Mrs X' (1)
- Case 22 Noel Greenaway (12)
- Case 23 Lucy Letby (2)
- Case 24 Fr Gordon MacRae (3)
- CCRC (21)
- Forensic evidence (13)
- General articles (186)
- Shaken Baby Syndrome (5)
- Uncategorized (9)
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Heinrich on A thousand reasons for Lehrmann appeal
- Peter Gill on Lucy Letby: Did she do it?
- Peter on Cross checking
- Peter Gill on Lucy Letby: Did she do it?
- andrew on Lucy Letby: Did she do it?
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- February 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
Meta
Category Archives: CCRC
CCRC – how NOT to do it
Andrew L. Urban. The worst possible failure of a Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) is to TWICE refuse to review a case on the request of the accused before DNA proves the accused was wrongfully convicted in the first place … Continue reading
Posted in CCRC
2 Comments
Wanted: Attorneys-General to help right wrongful convictions
Andrew L. Urban. If you could do one thing as an Attorney-General that would profoundly improve the criminal appeal system and reinforce the separation of powers … why not do it? Why haven’t they done it? Will they do it?
Posted in CCRC, General articles
14 Comments
Will the legal system learn from Folbigg, have the guts for reform?
Andrew L. Urban. The question of the title is posed without optimism. The legal system has no proud history of reform. All three past Attorneys-General have ignored or rebuffed calls for a Criminal Cases Review Commission network in Australia. Kathleen … Continue reading
Posted in Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg, CCRC, Forensic evidence
5 Comments
Call to hold off on Criminal Cases Review Commission “baffling” – Dr Bob Moles
The call by The Bridge of Hope Innocence Initiative (BOHII) to hold off on the development of a Criminal Cases Review Commission “is quite frankly baffling,” comments Dr Bob Moles, “and can, in my opinion, only serve to alienate them from their main client group – … Continue reading
Posted in CCRC, General articles
13 Comments
CCRC would relieve politicians of impossible choice
As things stand, politicians burdened with the responsibilities of Attorney-General often face the impossible choice of advising the relevant Governor on petitions from innocents convicted of sexual abuse. It should not be their choice; legal matters should stay within the … Continue reading
Posted in Case 06 'Paul', Case 22 Noel Greenaway, CCRC, General articles
26 Comments
A key piece of criminal justice infrastructure is missing
Professor David Hamer and Dr Andrew Dyer from Sydney Law School explain why Kathleen Folbigg’s pardon points to the need for a Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) in Australia.
Posted in Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg, CCRC, General articles
25 Comments
Folbigg freed, not guilty beyond reasonable doubt, Academy of Science calls for CCRC
Andrew L. Urban A decision by the NSW Attorney-General that should have been made four years ago by his predecessor has seen Kathleen Folbigg freed this morning on being granted a pardon by the Governor, on the recommendation of the … Continue reading
Posted in Case 17 Kathleen Folbigg, CCRC
15 Comments
Stonewalling 101: the legal system’s dirty little secret
Andrew L. Urban Under the constitutional doctrine of the separation of powers, parliaments make laws, the executive administers and enforces laws, and the judiciary adjudicates disputes about the law. The judiciary is thus insulated from outside oversight; that’s a good … Continue reading
Posted in CCRC, General articles
4 Comments
Sue Neill-Fraser case for CCRC
Andrew L. Urban. Following two unsuccessful appeals against her conviction for the 2009 murder of her partner Bob Chappell and twice refused leave to appeal to the High Court, Sue Neill-Fraser’s controversial 12 year old conviction is an ideal matter … Continue reading
Posted in Case 01 Sue Neill-Fraser, CCRC, General articles
21 Comments
MoJ Seminar in Hobart, November 24, 2022
Legal professionals, politicians, police and the public have a chance to hear how the criminal justice system sausage is made at a seminar “Lifting the Lid on Miscarriages of Justice.”
Posted in CCRC, General articles
11 Comments